Criminal Procedure Flashcards
7 cards from real OR BAR practice questions. Tap to flip, then mark Knew It or Still Learning — missed cards come back until you master them.
Read the first 7 Criminal Procedure flashcards as text
Under the Fourth Amendment, a search warrant must be supported by:
Answer: Probable cause supported by oath or affirmation
The Fourth Amendment explicitly requires probable cause supported by oath or affirmation for issuance of a valid search warrant.
Under the 'good faith' exception established in United States v. Leon, illegally obtained evidence may still be admitted if:
Answer: The officer acted in reasonable reliance on a warrant later found defective
Leon's good faith exception permits admission of evidence when officers reasonably relied on a warrant they had no reason to believe was defective.
Under Katz v. United States, the Fourth Amendment protects:
Answer: People's reasonable expectations of privacy, not just property rights
Katz v. United States established the 'reasonable expectation of privacy' test, making the Fourth Amendment protect people rather than merely places or property.
The automobile exception to the Fourth Amendment's warrant requirement allows police to search a vehicle without a warrant when:
Answer: There is probable cause to believe the vehicle contains contraband or evidence of a crime
Under Carroll v. United States, the automobile exception applies when officers have probable cause to believe a vehicle contains contraband or evidence, given the vehicle's inherent mobility and reduced privacy expectations.
Under Terry v. Ohio, a brief investigatory stop and pat-down is constitutionally permissible when:
Answer: An officer has reasonable articulable suspicion of criminal activity and reason to believe the suspect is armed
Terry permits brief investigatory stops based on reasonable articulable suspicion of criminal activity, and a limited pat-down when officers reasonably believe the suspect may be armed and dangerous.
In Caniglia v. Strom (2021), the U.S. Supreme Court held that the 'community caretaking' doctrine:
Answer: Does not justify warrantless searches of a home
The Court unanimously held in Caniglia that the community caretaking exception developed in the automobile context does not extend to justify warrantless entries into the home.
The 'independent source' doctrine as an exception to the exclusionary rule allows admission of evidence when:
Answer: The government shows the evidence was discovered through an independent, untainted source apart from the illegality
The independent source doctrine permits admission of evidence actually obtained through a separate, lawful channel completely independent of the constitutional violation.
How this page was made: written with AI tools and published by Nathan Beja, founder of Practice Test Geeks, who is responsible for its content. Exam facts are checked against the official sources listed below. Not reviewed by a subject-matter expert. Editorial policy
Sources & references
Exam facts on this page (fees, format, dates, passing scores) are checked against these official sources; the date is our last check. Editorial policy