Oregon Bar Exam (NextGen UBE) — Questions and Answers

Question 1: Under Oregon law, which of the following is a valid defense to a strict liability products claim?

Contributory negligence of the plaintiff
Assumption of the risk by knowingly using a defective product (Correct answer)
The defendant did not manufacture the product
The product complied with industry standards at the time of manufacture

Correct answer: Assumption of the risk by knowingly using a defective product

Assumption of the risk — where the plaintiff knowingly and voluntarily uses a product they know to be defective — is a complete or partial defense to strict products liability in Oregon.

Question 2: The automobile exception to the Fourth Amendment's warrant requirement allows police to search a vehicle without a warrant when:

The driver is arrested and the vehicle is searched incident to arrest
There is probable cause to believe the vehicle contains contraband or evidence of a crime (Correct answer)
The vehicle is parked in a public location visible to the officer
The vehicle is stopped for a traffic violation

Correct answer: There is probable cause to believe the vehicle contains contraband or evidence of a crime

Under Carroll v. United States, the automobile exception applies when officers have probable cause to believe a vehicle contains contraband or evidence, given the vehicle's inherent mobility and reduced privacy expectations.

Question 3: What distinguishes an Oregon durable power of attorney for finances from a conventional (non-durable) power of attorney?

A durable POA requires a court-appointed conservator to activate its powers
A durable POA must be recorded with the county recorder to take effect
A durable POA automatically converts to a guardianship upon the principal's incapacity
A durable POA remains effective despite the principal's subsequent incapacity, while a conventional POA terminates upon incapacity (Correct answer)

Correct answer: A durable POA remains effective despite the principal's subsequent incapacity, while a conventional POA terminates upon incapacity

The 'durable' designation means the power of attorney survives the principal's incapacity, which is the opposite of a conventional power that terminates upon incapacity.

Question 4: What is the Oregon constitutional provision that guarantees the right to a fair trial?

Article I, Section 11
Article I, Section 14
Article I, Section 11 (Correct answer)
Article I, Section 13

Correct answer: Article I, Section 11

Article I, Section 11 of the Oregon Constitution guarantees the right to a fair trial for criminal defendants. This section outlines several fundamental protections, including the right to a speedy and public trial, the right to an impartial jury, the right to confront witnesses, and the right to counsel. These provisions collectively ensure due process and a just legal proceeding for those accused of crimes in Oregon.

Question 5: Under the common law Statute of Frauds, which contract MUST be evidenced by a signed writing?

A contract for the sale of services worth $600
An oral agreement between two merchants for services
A contract for the sale of goods worth $400
A contract that cannot be performed within one year of formation (Correct answer)

Correct answer: A contract that cannot be performed within one year of formation

The Statute of Frauds requires a writing for contracts that cannot possibly be performed within one year from the date of formation.

Question 6: Which of the following actions by a state is most clearly prohibited by the Contract Clause of Article I, Section 10?

Regulating the procedural enforcement of existing contracts
Passing a law that modifies future contracts between private parties
Passing a law that substantially impairs existing private contractual obligations without adequate justification (Correct answer)
Taxing income derived from existing contracts

Correct answer: Passing a law that substantially impairs existing private contractual obligations without adequate justification

The Contract Clause prohibits states from passing any law impairing the obligation of existing contracts, and substantial impairment of private contracts is subject to heightened scrutiny under Home Building & Loan Ass'n v. Blaisdell.

Question 7: Under Miranda v. Arizona, the obligation to administer Miranda warnings is triggered when:

Police have probable cause to believe a person committed a crime
Police question any person who may have information about a crime
A person is detained, even briefly, for investigatory purposes
A suspect is in custody and subject to interrogation (Correct answer)

Correct answer: A suspect is in custody and subject to interrogation

Miranda warnings are required only when both elements are present: the suspect is in custody (deprived of freedom in a significant way) and subject to interrogation (express questioning or its functional equivalent).

Question 8: The constitutional requirement that an administrative adjudicator be free from bias and prejudgment is grounded in the:

Due Process Clause of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments (Correct answer)
First Amendment's guarantee of freedom to petition the government
Appointments Clause of Article II governing officer selection
Supremacy Clause requiring federal and state agencies to follow constitutional norms

Correct answer: Due Process Clause of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments

Due process requires a neutral and unbiased adjudicator; the Due Process Clause prohibits a decision-maker who has a direct financial or personal stake in the outcome.

Question 9: What is the standard of proof required for a conviction in a criminal case in Oregon?

Beyond a reasonable doubt (Correct answer)
Preponderance of the evidence
Clear and convincing evidence
Probable cause

Correct answer: Beyond a reasonable doubt

In a criminal case in Oregon, as in all U.S. jurisdictions, the prosecution must prove the defendant's guilt 'beyond a reasonable doubt.' This is the highest standard of proof in the legal system, signifying that the evidence presented must be so convincing that no reasonable person would question the defendant's guilt. This high standard is a cornerstone of due process, protecting individuals from wrongful conviction.

Question 10: What is the difference between a joint tenancy and a tenancy in common?

Joint tenancy is only for married couples
They are identical forms of co-ownership
Tenancy in common requires equal shares
Joint tenancy includes right of survivorship; tenancy in common allows inheritance by heirs (Correct answer)

Correct answer: Joint tenancy includes right of survivorship; tenancy in common allows inheritance by heirs

Joint tenancy features the right of survivorship (the surviving tenant inherits), while tenancy in common allows each co-owner to pass their share to heirs.

Question 11: What is assumption of risk as a defense to negligence?

The court assumes risk allocation between parties
The plaintiff knowingly and voluntarily encountered a known risk, potentially barring recovery (Correct answer)
Insurance companies assume all risk in negligence claims
The defendant assumed the risk of being sued

Correct answer: The plaintiff knowingly and voluntarily encountered a known risk, potentially barring recovery

Assumption of risk applies when the plaintiff was aware of a specific danger and voluntarily chose to encounter it, which may reduce or eliminate the defendant's liability.

Question 12: Shareholders of an Oregon corporation vote to ratify an interested director transaction. The effect of shareholder ratification is:

No effect — only disinterested director approval can cleanse an interested transaction
The interested director is automatically indemnified for all losses from the transaction
The burden shifts to the challenger to show the transaction was unfair to the corporation (Correct answer)
The transaction becomes completely immune from any legal challenge

Correct answer: The burden shifts to the challenger to show the transaction was unfair to the corporation

Informed shareholder ratification shifts the burden to the challenger to prove the transaction was unfair, but does not grant absolute immunity from challenge.

Question 13: A merchant signs a written offer stating it will remain open for 60 days. Under UCC §2-205 (the firm offer rule), this offer is irrevocable for:

30 days, the UCC's standard period
Three months regardless of the stated period
No time, because firm offers require consideration under the UCC
60 days as stated, since it is within the three-month statutory maximum (Correct answer)

Correct answer: 60 days as stated, since it is within the three-month statutory maximum

UCC firm offers are irrevocable for the period stated, up to a maximum of three months; 60 days falls within that maximum.

Question 14: In Oregon, products liability claims can be brought under which legal theories?

Strict liability, negligence, and breach of warranty (Correct answer)
Only breach of express warranty
Strict liability only
Negligence only

Correct answer: Strict liability, negligence, and breach of warranty

Oregon recognizes three theories for products liability: strict liability under ORS 30.900, negligence, and breach of warranty under the UCC.

Question 15: Which of the following is an example of an unprotected category of speech under the First Amendment?

Hyperbolic political rhetoric calling for general revolution
Commercial advertising for a lawful product
Offensive political satire targeting a public official
True threats directed at a specific individual (Correct answer)

Correct answer: True threats directed at a specific individual

True threats — statements where the speaker means to communicate a serious intent to commit unlawful violence against a specific person — are unprotected by the First Amendment.

Question 16: Maintenance spousal support in Oregon is most appropriate when:

The marriage was long-term and the supported spouse cannot reasonably become fully self-supporting (Correct answer)
A spouse sacrificed a career to put the other through professional school
The marriage lasted fewer than five years and both spouses are employed
A spouse needs short-term assistance finding a new job

Correct answer: The marriage was long-term and the supported spouse cannot reasonably become fully self-supporting

Maintenance support under ORS 107.105(1)(d)(C) provides ongoing support where a spouse cannot achieve self-sufficiency, typically after a lengthy marriage.

Question 17: During a drug conspiracy trial, a co-conspirator's recorded phone call stating 'We're delivering the package Tuesday' is offered against the defendant. The statement was made during and in furtherance of the conspiracy. The defendant objects on hearsay grounds. The court should:

Sustain the objection; co-conspirator statements require corroboration
Overrule; co-conspirator statements made in furtherance of the conspiracy are not hearsay (Correct answer)
Overrule; the statement qualifies as a business record
Sustain; recorded calls are excluded under the best evidence rule

Correct answer: Overrule; co-conspirator statements made in furtherance of the conspiracy are not hearsay

Under OEC 801(4)(b)(E), a statement by a co-conspirator made during and in furtherance of the conspiracy is an admission by a party-opponent and is not hearsay.

Question 18: Under Strickland v. Washington, a defendant claiming ineffective assistance of counsel must prove:

Counsel's performance was deficient AND there is a reasonable probability the outcome would have differed absent the errors (Correct answer)
Counsel failed to adequately communicate with the defendant before critical trial decisions
Counsel's cumulative errors taken together deprived the defendant of a fair trial
Counsel made errors that no competent attorney would have made

Correct answer: Counsel's performance was deficient AND there is a reasonable probability the outcome would have differed absent the errors

Strickland's two-prong test requires showing both deficient performance (below an objective standard of reasonableness) and resulting prejudice (reasonable probability of a different outcome).

Question 19: Courts 'pierce the corporate veil' and hold shareholders personally liable most commonly when:

The corporate form is used to perpetrate fraud or the corporation is merely the alter ego of its shareholder (Correct answer)
The corporation is incorporated in a different state than where it conducts business
The corporation has fewer than five shareholders
A shareholder personally guaranteed the corporation's debts

Correct answer: The corporate form is used to perpetrate fraud or the corporation is merely the alter ego of its shareholder

Veil-piercing typically requires showing the corporate form was used for fraud or that the corporation was so dominated by a shareholder as to be merely the shareholder's alter ego.

Question 20: A contract's liquidated damages clause specifies $5,000 for late delivery. The clause is enforceable if:

The amount was a reasonable pre-estimate of anticipated harm and actual damages are difficult to prove (Correct answer)
The clause applies only to the merchant party under the UCC
The amount deters breach and was separately initialed by both parties
Actual damages at the time of breach exceed $5,000

Correct answer: The amount was a reasonable pre-estimate of anticipated harm and actual damages are difficult to prove

Liquidated damages clauses are enforced when they represent a reasonable pre-estimate of anticipated harm and actual damages would be difficult to ascertain.

Question 21: A quitclaim deed differs from a general warranty deed in that a quitclaim deed:

Provides the broadest grantor warranty against all title defects, past and future
Conveys only whatever interest the grantor holds, with no covenants of title whatsoever (Correct answer)
Automatically conveys after-acquired title if the grantor later acquires the property
Is valid only when used between family members or to clear a cloud on title

Correct answer: Conveys only whatever interest the grantor holds, with no covenants of title whatsoever

A quitclaim deed transfers whatever interest the grantor has, if any, without any warranties, leaving the grantee no recourse against the grantor if the title fails.

Question 22: Defendant asserts a counterclaim against Plaintiff arising from a completely unrelated business dispute in a federal diversity case. Under FRCP 13, this counterclaim is best characterized as:

Compulsory, because it must be brought now or waived
Permissive, but only if it independently satisfies subject matter jurisdiction
Permissive, because it does not arise from the same transaction or occurrence as Plaintiff's claim (Correct answer)
Compulsory, because it involves the same parties

Correct answer: Permissive, because it does not arise from the same transaction or occurrence as Plaintiff's claim

FRCP 13(b) defines a permissive counterclaim as any claim not arising from the same transaction or occurrence; unlike compulsory counterclaims, it is not waived if omitted.

Question 23: Under the federal pleading standard established in Iqbal and Twombly, a complaint must contain what to survive a 12(b)(6) motion?

Specific dollar amounts and named witnesses for each allegation
A verified statement under penalty of perjury by the plaintiff
Detailed evidentiary facts supporting each element of the claim
A short and plain statement showing the pleader is entitled to relief with enough facts to state a plausible claim (Correct answer)

Correct answer: A short and plain statement showing the pleader is entitled to relief with enough facts to state a plausible claim

Post-Twombly/Iqbal, a complaint must allege sufficient factual matter to state a claim that is plausible on its face, not merely conceivable.

Question 24: What is the statute of frauds?

Certain contracts must be in writing to be enforceable, including land sales and contracts not performable within one year (Correct answer)
Only oral contracts are subject to fraud claims
Fraud automatically invalidates any contract
All contracts must be in writing

Correct answer: Certain contracts must be in writing to be enforceable, including land sales and contracts not performable within one year

The statute of frauds requires a signed writing for certain categories of contracts including land sales, contracts not performable within one year, surety agreements, and contracts for goods over $500 under the UCC.

Question 25: Under Oregon law, a shareholder in a closely-held corporation who is being 'squeezed out' by majority shareholders may have a claim for:

Breach of the duty of loyalty owed by majority shareholders acting as fiduciaries (Correct answer)
Breach of contract only if a shareholder agreement was violated
Violation of federal securities laws exclusively
No recognized claim because majority shareholders may act in self-interest

Correct answer: Breach of the duty of loyalty owed by majority shareholders acting as fiduciaries

Courts in closely-held corporations often impose heightened fiduciary duties on majority shareholders, allowing squeeze-out victims to bring claims for breach of the duty of loyalty.

Question 26: Under Oregon law, what is the significance of the Hadley v. Baxendale rule in contract damages?

Lost profits are never recoverable in Oregon contract cases
All damages flowing from a breach, however remote, are recoverable
The rule limits damages to the face value of the contract
Consequential damages are recoverable only if they were foreseeable at the time of contracting as a probable result of breach (Correct answer)

Correct answer: Consequential damages are recoverable only if they were foreseeable at the time of contracting as a probable result of breach

Oregon follows Hadley v. Baxendale, limiting consequential damages to those that were foreseeable at contract formation as a likely result of breach.

Question 27: A contract obligates a buyer to pay 'upon delivery of the goods.' Delivery is best classified as:

A warranty that the goods will conform to the contract
A condition subsequent that discharges the duty to pay
A condition precedent that must occur before the duty to pay arises (Correct answer)
A concurrent condition requiring simultaneous exchange

Correct answer: A condition precedent that must occur before the duty to pay arises

A condition precedent is an event that must occur before a party's contractual duty to perform becomes due.

Question 28: A state law grants in-state businesses a 5% tax preference over out-of-state competitors bidding on government contracts. Under the Dormant Commerce Clause, this law is most likely:

Constitutional as a market participant exception since the state is the buyer (Correct answer)
Constitutional because states may prefer their own citizens in government contracting
Unconstitutional because it discriminates against interstate commerce
Unconstitutional only if out-of-state businesses can prove discriminatory intent

Correct answer: Constitutional as a market participant exception since the state is the buyer

The market participant exception allows states to favor in-state firms when acting as a buyer or seller in the market rather than as a regulator, so a state may prefer in-state bidders for government contracts.

Question 29: The implied warranty of habitability in a residential lease obligates the landlord to:

Disclose all known defects to the tenant before executing the lease
Maintain the premises in a condition fit for human habitation throughout the tenancy (Correct answer)
Ensure the property is free from all defects, however minor, throughout the tenancy
Repair any damage caused by the tenant at the landlord's expense

Correct answer: Maintain the premises in a condition fit for human habitation throughout the tenancy

The implied warranty of habitability requires landlords to maintain residential premises in a safe and livable condition — covering essentials such as heat, plumbing, and structural integrity — throughout the lease term.

Question 30: In Oregon, which of the following is the primary requirement for a court to grant a preliminary injunction?

Likelihood of success on the merits, irreparable harm, balance of hardships favoring the movant, and public interest (Correct answer)
A bond equal to the full value of the anticipated damages
A showing that damages would be an adequate remedy at law
Proof that the opposing party acted in bad faith

Correct answer: Likelihood of success on the merits, irreparable harm, balance of hardships favoring the movant, and public interest

Oregon courts apply the four-factor preliminary injunction test: likely success, irreparable harm, balance of hardships, and public interest.

Question 31: Plaintiff sues Defendant, who then files a third-party complaint against Subcontractor under FRCP 14. Which claim may Defendant assert as a third-party plaintiff?

A claim that Subcontractor is or may be liable to Defendant for all or part of Plaintiff's claim against Defendant (Correct answer)
A declaratory judgment that Subcontractor owes Defendant money on a prior contract
Any independent claim Defendant has against Subcontractor regardless of connection to Plaintiff's claim
A claim that Subcontractor committed fraud against Defendant in an unrelated matter

Correct answer: A claim that Subcontractor is or may be liable to Defendant for all or part of Plaintiff's claim against Defendant

FRCP 14(a) permits impleader only for claims that the third party is or may be liable to the defendant for the plaintiff's claim—typically indemnity or contribution.

Oregon Bar Exam (NextGen UBE)

The Oregon Bar Exam is a NextGen Uniform Bar Examination testing foundational legal knowledge across 8 core subject areas through standalone multiple-choice questions, integrated question sets, and performance tasks. Adopted by Oregon in July 2026, it evaluates both doctrinal knowledge and practical lawyering skills required of newly licensed attorneys.

Questions

40 min

Time Limit

68%

To Pass

Checking for saved progress...

Exam Rules

You can skip questions and return to them later
Flag questions for review before submitting
No feedback shown until you submit the entire exam
Unanswered questions count as wrong — answer everything
10 pretest questions are mixed in and don't affect your score
Timer auto-submits when time runs out
Your progress is auto-saved every 30 seconds