NPOST Police Test Police Report Writing Questions and Answers 1 — Questions and Answers
Question 1: Which of the following statements is the most objective and fact-based for inclusion in a police report?
- The suspect was acting nervously and seemed to be hiding something.
- The driver was clearly intoxicated and driving recklessly.
- The witness appeared credible and was visibly upset by the incident.
- The subject spoke with slurred speech, had bloodshot eyes, and was unsteady on his feet. (Correct answer)
Correct answer: The subject spoke with slurred speech, had bloodshot eyes, and was unsteady on his feet.
Police reports must be based on objective, observable facts. The correct answer describes specific, observable details (slurred speech, bloodshot eyes, unsteadiness) without drawing a conclusion. The other options include subjective conclusions like 'nervously,' 'clearly intoxicated,' and 'appeared credible,' which are interpretations, not direct observations.
Question 2: An officer is writing a report about a burglary. The report should be written in a way that is clear, concise, complete, and correct. Which of the following principles is most critical for ensuring the report can be used effectively in court?
- Using complex vocabulary to demonstrate professionalism.
- Including the officer's personal opinion on the suspect's guilt.
- Sticking strictly to the chronological order of events. (Correct answer)
- Writing in the passive voice to maintain objectivity.
Correct answer: Sticking strictly to the chronological order of events.
Organizing a report chronologically provides a clear and easy-to-follow sequence of events. This logical structure helps prosecutors, defense attorneys, and juries understand what happened and in what order. While active voice is preferred and opinions should be avoided, the chronological flow is fundamental to a report's narrative integrity.
Question 3: Officer Miller arrives at the scene of a domestic disturbance. He interviews the reporting party, a neighbor, who states she heard loud screaming from the adjacent apartment. When writing his report, how should Officer Miller document this information?
- The neighbors confirmed a loud domestic disturbance was in progress.
- I was advised by a neighbor that a loud argument was occurring.
- A witness stated that she heard what she believed to be loud screaming coming from the apartment. (Correct answer)
- It was obvious a violent fight had taken place based on neighbor reports.
Correct answer: A witness stated that she heard what she believed to be loud screaming coming from the apartment.
This answer is the most precise and accurate. It correctly attributes the information to the source ('A witness stated') and uses her specific words ('loud screaming'). This avoids making assumptions or generalizations. The other options are either too vague ('advised by a neighbor') or state conclusions not directly supported by the single witness statement ('confirmed a domestic disturbance,' 'obvious a violent fight').
Question 4: Which of the following is a primary reason to avoid using police jargon or abbreviations in a report?
- It can make the report seem less professional to supervisors.
- Defense attorneys may not understand the terminology used.
- It makes the report unnecessarily long and difficult to write.
- The report must be easily understood by a civilian audience, such as a jury. (Correct answer)
Correct answer: The report must be easily understood by a civilian audience, such as a jury.
Police reports are read by a wide range of individuals, including supervisors, attorneys, judges, and jurors. Many of these readers will not be familiar with law enforcement-specific jargon. Using plain, clear language ensures that the facts of the incident are understandable to everyone, which is critical for legal proceedings.
Question 5: A good police report should answer the six essential questions: Who, What, When, Where, Why, and How. Which of these questions is often the most difficult to answer factually and should be approached with the most caution?
- When
- Where
- Why (Correct answer)
- Who
Correct answer: Why
The question 'Why' often deals with a person's motive or intent, which is not something an officer can directly observe. Reporting on 'Why' can lead to speculation or conclusion. Officers should report on the facts and statements that might suggest a motive, but should avoid definitively stating the reason 'why' an event occurred unless quoting a confession.
Question 6: When describing a suspect in an incident report, which of the following provides the most useful and objective information?
- A tall, intimidating-looking male in his late 20s.
- A male, approximately 6'2", 200 lbs, wearing a black hooded sweatshirt and blue jeans. (Correct answer)
- A suspicious character who was loitering in the area and looked like he was up to no good.
- A man who seemed to be a transient, based on his dirty clothes and unkempt appearance.
Correct answer: A male, approximately 6'2", 200 lbs, wearing a black hooded sweatshirt and blue jeans.
This option provides specific, measurable, and factual details: approximate height and weight, and a clear description of clothing. The other options rely on subjective and conclusory language such as 'intimidating-looking,' 'suspicious character,' and 'seemed to be a transient,' which are opinions, not objective facts suitable for a police report.
NPOST Police Test Police Report Writing Questions and Answers 1
Which of the following statements is the most objective and fact-based for inclusion in a police report?