Reading Comprehension: Analyzing Textual Evidence Flashcards
7 cards from real Nelson-Denny Reading Test practice questions. Tap to flip, then mark Knew It or Still Learning — missed cards come back until you master them.
Read the first 7 Reading Comprehension: Analyzing Textual Evidence flashcards as text
A passage states: 'Despite widespread criticism, the policy remained in effect for three more years, during which accident rates fell by 12%.' Which conclusion is best supported by this evidence?
Answer: The policy had some measurable positive outcome despite opposition
The 12% drop in accident rates during the policy's continuation is direct textual evidence of a positive measurable outcome.
When an author uses a personal anecdote as evidence in an argument, a critical reader should recognize that this type of evidence is:
Answer: Limited in scope and may not represent broader patterns
Personal anecdotes are individual experiences that may not generalize, making them limited as evidence for broad claims.
A paragraph ends with: 'These findings suggest a link between sleep deprivation and reduced cognitive performance.' The word 'suggest' indicates that the author is:
Answer: Presenting a cautious, qualified interpretation of the evidence
Words like 'suggest' signal that the author is making a careful, tentative claim rather than a definitive statement.
Two paragraphs in a passage both describe the same historical event but reach different conclusions. The best way to resolve this discrepancy is to:
Answer: Examine the specific evidence each paragraph uses to support its conclusion
Comparing the supporting evidence in each paragraph reveals why the authors reached different conclusions and which is better supported.
A passage claims that 'most scientists agree' on a particular point but cites no specific sources. This weakens the argument because:
Answer: Vague references to unnamed experts cannot be verified or evaluated
Without identifying specific sources, the claim 'most scientists agree' is unverifiable and therefore weak as textual evidence.
A student reads: 'The river flooded four times between 1990 and 2000, compared to once between 1980 and 1990.' Which inference is most directly supported by this evidence?
Answer: Flood frequency increased in the decade from 1990 to 2000
The numerical comparison directly supports the conclusion that flooding occurred more frequently in the 1990–2000 period.
Which of the following would serve as the strongest textual evidence that a character in a story is dishonest?
Answer: The character's own words contradict their earlier statements in the text
Self-contradictory statements within the text are direct, verifiable evidence of dishonesty, unlike suspicion or vague description.
How this page was made: written with AI tools and published by Nathan Beja, founder of Practice Test Geeks, who is responsible for its content. Exam facts are checked against the official sources listed below. Not reviewed by a subject-matter expert. Editorial policy
Sources & references
Exam facts on this page (fees, format, dates, passing scores) are checked against these official sources; the date is our last check. Editorial policy
- proedinc.com — Test delivery, eligibility, exam format, retake policy, exam information · verified Oct 2026
- parinc.com — Time limit · verified Oct 2026