The NCA Exams for Foreign-Trained Lawyers is a professional certification assessment in Canada. Thorough preparation is essential to demonstrate your knowledge and competency in this field.
Our comprehensive collection of free NCA practice questions covers all exam domains and topics. Use these detailed study materials to build confidence and improve your test performance.
Interactive NCA Exam resources on PracticeTestGeeks, free to start:
The NCA takes about 3 hours and costs 500 CAD[1][2] (National Committee on Accreditation, verified Oct 27, 2026).
Numbers in brackets link to the official sources listed under Sources & last verified. Dates that have passed are removed automatically.
| Item | Detail | Source · Verified |
|---|---|---|
| Number of questions | Long-response, open-book (hard-copy materials only)[3] | National Committee on Accreditation · Oct 27, 2026 |
| Time limit | 3 hours[1] | National Committee on Accreditation · Oct 27, 2026 |
| Passing score | 50% (pass/fail)[2] | National Committee on Accreditation · Oct 27, 2026 |
| Exam fee | CAD $500 plus taxes per exam[2] | National Committee on Accreditation · Oct 27, 2026 |
| Retake fee | CAD $500 plus taxes per re-write[4] | National Committee on Accreditation · Oct 27, 2026 |
| Retake policy | 3 attempts; 4th must be requested[3] | National Committee on Accreditation · Oct 27, 2026 |
| Validity | Does not expire[5] | National Committee on Accreditation · Oct 27, 2026 |
| Delivery | Online proctored[6] | National Committee on Accreditation · Oct 27, 2026 |
| Eligibility | NCA assessment required; exams must be among assigned requirements[2] | National Committee on Accreditation · Oct 27, 2026 |
| Score release | 10 to 12 weeks after the session's last exam[2] | National Committee on Accreditation · Oct 27, 2026 |
| Next exam date (Business Organizations) | February 1, 2027[1] | National Committee on Accreditation · Oct 27, 2026 |
| Next exam date (Canadian Administrative Law) | November 17–20, 2026[7] | National Committee on Accreditation · Oct 28, 2026 |
| Next exam date (Canadian Constitutional Law) | January 5–8, 2027[1] | National Committee on Accreditation · Oct 27, 2026 |
| Next exam date (Canadian Criminal Law) | November 9–13, 2026 (no exams Nov 11)[7] | National Committee on Accreditation · Oct 28, 2026 |
| Next exam date (Canadian Professional Responsibility) | November 3–6, 2026[7] | National Committee on Accreditation · Oct 28, 2026 |
| Next exam date (Civil Procedure) | March 3, 2027[1] | National Committee on Accreditation · Oct 27, 2026 |
| Next exam date (Commercial Law) | January 4, 2027[1] | National Committee on Accreditation · Oct 27, 2026 |
| Next exam date (Contracts) | January 11, 2027[1] | National Committee on Accreditation · Oct 27, 2026 |
| Next exam date (Evidence) | April 12, 2027[1] | National Committee on Accreditation · Oct 27, 2026 |
| Next exam date (Family Law) | November 2, 2026[7] | National Committee on Accreditation · Oct 28, 2026 |
| Next exam date (Foundations of Canadian Law) | January 12–15, 2027[1] | National Committee on Accreditation · Oct 27, 2026 |
| Next exam date (Property) | February 16, 2027[1] | National Committee on Accreditation · Oct 27, 2026 |
| Next exam date (Remedies) | March 1, 2027[1] | National Committee on Accreditation · Oct 27, 2026 |
| Next exam date (Torts) | November 16, 2026[7] | National Committee on Accreditation · Oct 28, 2026 |
| Registration deadline | December 10, 2026, 11 p.m. ET[1] | National Committee on Accreditation · Oct 27, 2026 |
| Registration deadline (January 2027 session) | December 10, 2026, 11 p.m. ET[1] | National Committee on Accreditation · Oct 27, 2026 |
| Registration opens | November 16, 2026[1] | National Committee on Accreditation · Oct 27, 2026 |
| Registration opens (January 2027 session) | November 16, 2026[1] | National Committee on Accreditation · Oct 27, 2026 |
Important: The NCA examination requires thorough understanding of all core subject areas. Review the official Canadian exam guidelines and ensure you meet all eligibility requirements before scheduling your test date.
According to National Committee on Accreditation, “NCA exams are long response form, and open- book. Only hard copy study materials will be permitted; you will NOT have access to electronic copies of your notes or textbooks.”[3]
Prepare for the NCA - National Committee on Accreditation exam with our free practice test modules. Each quiz covers key topics to help you pass on your first try.
These are practice questions written for this site, not questions from the real exam. Each explanation shows why the right answer is right and why the others are wrong.
Question: In Quebec, the sale of residential real property is often completed using which instrument, and what is its legal significance?
Answer: A. A deed of sale (acte de vente) notarized before a notary, which constitutes an authentic act and can be executed directly without court intervention
Explanation:
The correct answer is the notarized deed of sale (acte de vente). In Quebec, a notary drafts and receives the deed, and that makes it an authentic act. An authentic act has special evidentiary weight, and it can be enforced directly without first going to court.
A simple signed agreement registered at the courthouse is wrong because a private writing lacks that authentic status, and the courthouse is not where property sales are registered. An electronic transfer form filed with the land registry is wrong because registration records a transaction but does not replace the notarial form the sale takes. A Superior Court order is wrong because an ordinary sale is a private transaction, not a judicial one.
Rule to remember: in Quebec civil law, the notary and the authentic act are central to real property transactions, which differs from the common law provinces.
Question: The 'peace, order, and good government' clause in s. 91 of the Constitution Act, 1867 gives Parliament residual power. In which scenario has the Supreme Court of Canada upheld POGG as a basis for federal legislation?
Answer: B. Enacting anti-inflation measures as a national emergency
Explanation:
The correct answer is enacting anti-inflation measures as a national emergency. The Supreme Court of Canada accepted that Parliament could rely on the emergency branch of peace, order, and good government when it had a rational basis for treating a problem as a national emergency.
Regulating provincial labour relations is wrong because labour relations generally fall under provincial authority over property and civil rights. Licensing provincial taverns is wrong because it is a local matter within provincial jurisdiction. Establishing municipal zoning rules is wrong because municipalities are created by provinces, and land use planning is a provincial concern.
Rule to remember: the residual power is not a general licence to legislate on local matters. It supports federal law only in limited situations such as a genuine national emergency, and the other branches have their own tests.
Question: The tort of defamation in Canadian law requires a plaintiff to establish which elements?
Answer: B. That the statement was defamatory (tended to lower reputation), referred to the plaintiff, and was published to a third party
Explanation:
The correct answer lists the elements of defamation: the statement tended to lower the plaintiff's reputation, it referred to the plaintiff, and it was published to a third party.
The option requiring a false statement made intentionally and with malice is wrong because the plaintiff does not have to prove intent or malice, and falsity is presumed once the elements are shown. The option requiring measurable financial loss is wrong because damage is presumed in defamation, so the plaintiff does not first have to prove a specific loss. The option about a position of trust or authority is wrong because it describes a different kind of claim, and no such relationship is needed here.
Rule to remember: the plaintiff proves meaning, reference and publication, then the burden shifts to the defendant to raise a defence such as truth.
Start with the official NCA information for your own assigned requirements. Make a list of the exams you must write, then check the exam schedule so you know which session each one falls in. Work backwards from the date of your earliest exam.
Begin with the main practice test at FREE NCA PRACTICE TEST to see which subjects feel weakest. Then move to the subject sets that match your list, such as NCA Contract Law, NCA Criminal Law, NCA Canadian Constitutional Law or NCA Administrative Law. Read the explanation for every question you miss, and write the rule it teaches in your own words.
Our questions are multiple choice and written by us, not real exam questions. The real exam is long-response, so use the practice sets to check your knowledge of the rules, then practise writing full answers by hand or on a timer under your own conditions.
Because the exam is open-book with hard-copy materials only, build a printed set of notes with a clear index. Practise finding a rule in it quickly. In the final days, retake the sets you found hardest and confirm the format, registration dates and fee on nca.legal.
Join thousands of candidates who have used our free practice tests to prepare for the NCA Exams for Foreign-Trained Lawyers. Start practising today and build the confidence you need to succeed. Practice with the free NCA practice test on PracticeTestGeeks (7 questions with answer explanations).
For more in-depth preparation strategies, read our How to Pass the NCAE Exam in 2026 — Complete Study Guide — covering exam format, scoring, and proven study techniques.
Try these questions from our free NCA Exam practice tests. The correct answer and an explanation follow each question.
Under Canadian contract law, the test for remoteness of damages in breach of contract cases derives from which English case adopted across Canadian common law provinces?
Answer: B. Hadley v. Baxendale (1854)
Hadley v. Baxendale established the two limbs of contractual remoteness: damages recoverable are those arising naturally from the breach (first limb), or those in the reasonable contemplation of both parties at the time of contracting (second limb). Canadian courts consistently apply this test.
In preparing a legal memorandum on a constitutional issue for an NCA exam, which analytical step should come first?
Answer: B. Characterize the law using the pith and substance doctrine to identify the relevant head of power and whether the enacting body has jurisdiction
In constitutional analysis, the first step is always to determine whether the enacting body had jurisdiction under the division of powers (ss. 91/92). If the law is validly enacted (within jurisdiction), then the analysis moves to Charter compliance. Remedies are only reached after a finding of invalidity.
A refugee determination panel member has previously made public statements about the lack of credibility of claimants from a specific country. An applicant from that country raises a bias argument. Under the reasonable apprehension of bias test, what is the most likely outcome?
Answer: B. The statements raise a reasonable apprehension of bias and the member should be disqualified
Prior public statements suggesting prejudgment of an issue before the panel constitutes a reasonable apprehension of bias. An informed, reasonable observer would think it more likely than not that the decision-maker could not approach the claim with an open mind.
Section 15(1) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees equality rights. Which of the following correctly states the test for a s. 15(1) violation?
Answer: B. The law creates a distinction based on an enumerated or analogous ground that is discriminatory in substance
Under Quebec (AG) v. A and Fraser v. Canada, a s. 15(1) breach requires (1) a distinction in law or in effect, (2) based on an enumerated or analogous ground, (3) that is substantively discriminatory (perpetuates disadvantage or stereotyping). Intent is irrelevant.
How we verify: editorial & fact-checking policy. Report an error: contact us.