A student reads the following passage conclusion: 'While advocates of standardised testing argue that uniform metrics ensure accountability, the persistent socioeconomic disparities in performance outcomes suggest that such instruments may systematically disadvantage learners from under-resourced environments, rendering the very premise of objectivity contestable.' Which rhetorical strategy does the author primarily employ here?
-
A
Concession followed by rebuttal to undermine the opposing position
-
B
Circular reasoning that restates the initial claim without new evidence
-
C
Ad hominem attack on proponents of standardised testing
-
D
False dichotomy between accountability and equity