← All MN BAR Flashcard Decks

Evidence and Trial Practice Flashcards

6 cards from real MN BAR practice questions. Tap to flip, then mark Knew It or Still Learning — missed cards come back until you master them.

Read the first 6 Evidence and Trial Practice flashcards as text
  1. In a Minnesota civil trial, when may a court grant judgment as a matter of law (directed verdict) to a defendant?

    Answer: After the plaintiff rests, if reasonable minds could not differ on the outcome

    Under Minn. R. Civ. P. 50, a motion for judgment as a matter of law may be made after a party has been fully heard and the evidence is legally insufficient for a reasonable jury to find for that party.

  2. Under the Minnesota Rules of Civil Procedure, a party seeking a new trial must file a motion within:

    Answer: 30 days of the verdict

    Under Minn. R. Civ. P. 59.03, a motion for a new trial must be served within 30 days after a general verdict or decision.

  3. Under Minnesota Rule of Evidence 801(d)(2), which admission by a party opponent is NOT hearsay?

    Answer: An out-of-court statement by the party offered against them

    Under Minn. R. Evid. 801(d)(2), a party's own out-of-court statement offered against them is defined as not hearsay — it is an admission by party opponent.

  4. In Minnesota, which of the following is required for the excited utterance exception to hearsay under Rule 803(2)?

    Answer: The statement must relate to a startling event and be made under its stress

    Minn. R. Evid. 803(2) requires that the statement relate to a startling event and be made while the declarant was still under the stress or excitement of the event.

  5. Under Minnesota Rules of Civil Procedure, which discovery method allows a party to require a non-party to produce documents?

    Answer: Subpoena duces tecum

    Under Minn. R. Civ. P. 45, a subpoena duces tecum compels a non-party to produce documents, electronically stored information, or tangible things.

  6. In Minnesota, which standard governs a court's decision to grant or deny a preliminary injunction?

    Answer: Preponderance of the evidence on all four Dataphase factors

    Minnesota courts follow the Dataphase factors: likelihood of success on the merits, threat of irreparable harm, balance of harms, and public interest, weighed under a preponderance standard.

How this page was made: written with AI tools and published by Nathan Beja, founder of Practice Test Geeks, who is responsible for its content. Exam facts are checked against the official sources listed below. Not reviewed by a subject-matter expert. Editorial policy

Sources & references

Exam facts on this page (fees, format, dates, passing scores) are checked against these official sources; the date is our last check. Editorial policy

  1. ble.mn.gov — Test delivery, exam dates, late registration, retake policy, score release, time limit, exam format, passing score, score validity, eligibility · verified Oct 2026
  2. ncbex.org — Fees · verified Oct 2026