← All MA BAR Flashcard Decks

Evidence Flashcards

6 cards from real MA BAR practice questions. Tap to flip, then mark Knew It or Still Learning — missed cards come back until you master them.

Read the first 6 Evidence flashcards as text
  1. Under the Federal Rules of Evidence, hearsay is generally defined as an out-of-court statement offered to prove:

    Answer: The truth of the matter asserted

    Hearsay under FRE 801 is an out-of-court statement offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted, and it is generally inadmissible under FRE 802.

  2. The excited utterance exception to hearsay requires that:

    Answer: The statement relate to a startling event and be made while under the stress of excitement

    Under FRE 803(2), an excited utterance is a statement relating to a startling event or condition made while the declarant was under the stress of excitement caused by the event.

  3. Under Massachusetts Guide to Evidence, a prior consistent statement by a witness is admissible to rehabilitate the witness's credibility when:

    Answer: The prior statement was made before a motive to fabricate arose, and the opposing party has charged fabrication or improper motive

    Under the Massachusetts Guide to Evidence, a prior consistent statement is admissible for rehabilitation when an opposing party has charged recent fabrication and the statement predates the motive to fabricate.

  4. The attorney-client privilege protects communications that are:

    Answer: Between an attorney and client, made in confidence, for the purpose of obtaining legal advice

    The attorney-client privilege covers confidential communications between attorney and client made for the purpose of obtaining or providing legal advice, and does not apply when third parties are present.

  5. Which rule governs the admissibility of character evidence in a civil case to prove that a person acted in conformity with their character on a specific occasion?

    Answer: Character evidence is generally inadmissible to prove conduct in civil cases

    Under FRE 404(a)(1), character evidence is generally not admissible in civil cases to prove that a person acted in conformity with the character trait on the occasion in question.

  6. Under the best evidence rule, which must be produced to prove the contents of a writing?

    Answer: The original document, or an acceptable duplicate

    The best evidence rule (FRE 1002) requires the original writing to prove its contents, though FRE 1003 allows admissible duplicates unless authenticity or fairness is genuinely in question.

How this page was made: written with AI tools and published by Nathan Beja, founder of Practice Test Geeks, who is responsible for its content. Exam facts are checked against the official sources listed below. Not reviewed by a subject-matter expert. Editorial policy

Sources & references

Exam facts on this page (fees, format, dates, passing scores) are checked against these official sources; the date is our last check. Editorial policy

  1. mass.gov — Test delivery, exam dates, score release, eligibility, fees, registration deadline, registration, retake policy, exam format, passing score · verified Oct 2026