LNAT Formulating Persuasive Arguments 5

Question 1

An essay argues: 'Either we abolish the minimum wage entirely or workers will always be exploited.' What fallacy is present?

Accepted Answer

False dichotomy

Answer

False dichotomy presents only two options when other possibilities exist, such as raising, indexing, or reforming the minimum wage rather than abolishing it.

Question 2

Which of the following is the strongest counter-argument to the claim 'Jury trials should be abolished because juries are emotionally biased'?

Accepted Answer

Emotional bias can be mitigated through juror selection, instructions, and deliberation, while juries also provide democratic legitimacy

Answer

This response directly addresses the bias concern by showing it can be managed, then adds the positive value juries provide — a two-pronged rebuttal.

Question 3

Why is it rhetorically effective to use the phrase 'Even if we accept...' in a persuasive argument?

Accepted Answer

It shows that your argument succeeds even under the opponent's most favorable assumptions

Answer

Granting the opponent's premise for the sake of argument and still winning demonstrates that your position is robust regardless of contested factual assumptions.

Question 4

What is 'question-begging' (petitio principii)?

Accepted Answer

Assuming the conclusion within the premises of the argument

Answer

Question-begging embeds the conclusion in the premises, making the argument circular since the conclusion is required to accept the premise.

Question 5

In formulating a persuasive argument about a contested legal issue, which strategy best ensures internal consistency?

Accepted Answer

Maintaining a single coherent definition of key terms and applying it consistently throughout

Answer

Consistent definitions prevent internal contradiction and make the argument harder to undermine by exposing shifts in meaning.

LNAT - Law National Aptitude Test Practice Test

LNAT - Law National Aptitude Test Practice Test

LNAT Formulating Persuasive Arguments 5