Legal Research & Writing Flashcards
7 cards from real Legal - Attorneys practice questions. Tap to flip, then mark Knew It or Still Learning โ missed cards come back until you master them.
Read the first 7 Legal Research & Writing flashcards as text
Under ABA Model Rule 3.3, an attorney must disclose legal authority in the controlling jurisdiction that is directly adverse to the client's position when:
Answer: Opposing counsel has not disclosed it
Model Rule 3.3(a)(2) requires disclosure of known directly adverse controlling authority not disclosed by opposing counsel.
By signing a brief under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11, an attorney certifies that the legal contentions are:
Answer: Warranted by existing law or by a nonfrivolous argument for changing the law
Rule 11(b)(2) requires legal contentions to be warranted by existing law or a nonfrivolous argument to extend, modify, or reverse it.
A statute lists 'cars, trucks, motorcycles, and other vehicles.' A court holds that 'other vehicles' does not include airplanes. Which canon did it apply?
Answer: Ejusdem generis
Ejusdem generis limits general words following a specific list to items of the same kind.
A statute grants a tax exemption to 'churches and schools.' A hospital claims the exemption. Which canon most directly supports denying it?
Answer: Expressio unius est exclusio alterius
Expressio unius holds that expressly listing certain items implies the exclusion of others.
In statutory interpretation, where does a court ordinarily begin its analysis?
Answer: The plain text of the statute
Courts start with the statutory text, and if it is unambiguous, the inquiry usually ends there.
Under the rule of lenity, a genuinely ambiguous criminal statute is construed:
Answer: In favor of the defendant
The rule of lenity resolves true ambiguity in criminal statutes in favor of the accused.
An attorney files a brief containing case citations generated by an AI tool that turn out to be nonexistent. What is the most likely consequence?
Answer: Sanctions under Rule 11 for failing to make a reasonable inquiry
Courts, as in Mata v. Avianca (S.D.N.Y. 2023), have imposed Rule 11 sanctions for failing to verify AI-generated citations.
How this page was made: written with AI tools and published by Nathan Beja, founder of Practice Test Geeks, who is responsible for its content. We have not yet matched this exam's facts to an official source, so confirm fees, dates and rules with the exam body. Not reviewed by a subject-matter expert. Editorial policy