GRE - Graduate Record Examinations Analyze an Issue Essay Questions and Answers 1 — Questions and Answers
Question 1: A test-taker is responding to the prompt: "Claim: The most effective way to understand a society is to examine its scientific and technological innovations." The test-taker decides to argue against the claim by using only the example of ancient Rome, focusing entirely on its legal and political systems. What is the primary weakness of this approach?
- The example of ancient Rome is irrelevant to the prompt.
- A single, narrowly-focused example is insufficient to address the complexity of the claim. (Correct answer)
- The essay should agree with the claim, as scientific progress is always the most important factor.
- Historical examples are less persuasive than examples from current events.
Correct answer: A single, narrowly-focused example is insufficient to address the complexity of the claim.
High-scoring "Analyze an Issue" essays demonstrate an understanding of the topic's complexity. Relying on a single example, no matter how well-explained, often fails to provide a comprehensive analysis. A stronger essay would either use multiple examples to support its point or, if using a single extended example, would also acknowledge and refute other perspectives, such as the role technology *did* play in that society.
Question 2: Which of the following best describes the primary purpose of a thesis statement in a GRE "Analyze an Issue" essay?
- To articulate a clear, specific, and defensible position on the issue presented in the prompt. (Correct answer)
- To demonstrate sophisticated vocabulary and complex sentence structure.
- To summarize the arguments that both sides of the issue might make.
- To provide a detailed list of the examples that will be discussed in the essay.
Correct answer: To articulate a clear, specific, and defensible position on the issue presented in the prompt.
The thesis statement is the core of the essay. Its main job is to clearly and directly state the writer's position on the issue. This position must be arguable and serves as the controlling idea for the entire essay, guiding the development of body paragraphs and evidence.
Question 3: A writer is planning an essay and wants to achieve a high score by demonstrating nuanced thinking. Which of the following strategies is most effective for this purpose?
- Arguing one side of the issue as forcefully as possible, ignoring any potential weaknesses in their own position.
- Using only personal anecdotes as evidence to create an emotional connection with the grader.
- Qualifying the main argument by acknowledging a valid counterargument and then refuting it. (Correct answer)
- Strictly following a five-paragraph structure with exactly three examples, regardless of the prompt.
Correct answer: Qualifying the main argument by acknowledging a valid counterargument and then refuting it.
Top-scoring essays often explore the complexities of an issue rather than taking a simple, one-sided stance. Acknowledging a counterargument and then explaining why your own position is still stronger (a process called refutation) demonstrates critical thinking and a deep engagement with the topic.
Question 4: When selecting evidence for an "Analyze an Issue" essay, which of the following is the most important characteristic of the examples chosen?
- They are obscure facts that the grader is unlikely to know.
- They are directly relevant to the point being made and are explained thoroughly. (Correct answer)
- They are all from the same field, such as history or science, to show expertise.
- They are primarily hypothetical scenarios about what could happen in the future.
Correct answer: They are directly relevant to the point being made and are explained thoroughly.
The strength of an example lies not in its source, but in its application. A well-chosen example from history, current events, literature, or even personal experience can be highly effective, but only if it is clearly and logically connected back to the essay's thesis and the specific point of the paragraph. Simply dropping in a fact or story without explaining its significance is a common mistake.
Question 5: Which of the following actions is most likely to result in a low score on the "Analyze an Issue" essay?
- Spending the first 3-5 minutes brainstorming and creating an outline.
- Using transitional phrases like "however" and "therefore" to connect ideas.
- Writing an essay that simply summarizes the prompt's issue without taking a clear position. (Correct answer)
- Concluding the essay by briefly restating the thesis and main points.
Correct answer: Writing an essay that simply summarizes the prompt's issue without taking a clear position.
The task requires the test-taker to "analyze an issue" and develop an argument. An essay that only describes the issue or explains it from a neutral standpoint fails to fulfill the core requirement of the prompt, which is to take and defend a position. This demonstrates a fundamental misunderstanding of the task.
Question 6: A test-taker writes the following thesis statement in response to a prompt about government funding for the arts: "Government funding for the arts is a complicated topic with many pros and cons that are worth discussing." Why is this thesis considered weak for a GRE essay?
- It uses the first-person pronoun "I", which is not allowed.
- It focuses on a controversial topic that should be avoided.
- It is too long and contains too much detail for an introduction.
- It fails to take a clear, arguable position on the issue. (Correct answer)
Correct answer: It fails to take a clear, arguable position on the issue.
A strong thesis must state a clear and specific position. The example thesis is a statement of fact (the topic is complicated) rather than an arguable claim. It doesn't tell the reader what the author's actual argument will be. A better thesis would be, for example, "While some argue that government funding for the arts is a frivolous expense, it is a crucial investment in a nation's cultural identity and economic vitality."
GRE - Graduate Record Examinations Analyze an Issue Essay Questions and Answers 1
A test-taker is responding to the prompt: "Claim: The most effective way to understand a society is to examine its scientific and technological innovations." The test-taker decides to argue against the claim by using only the example of ancient Rome, focusing entirely on its legal and political systems.
What is the primary weakness of this approach?