Defamation and Privacy Torts Flashcards
7 cards from real FYLSX practice questions. Tap to flip, then mark Knew It or Still Learning — missed cards come back until you master them.
Read the first 7 Defamation and Privacy Torts flashcards as text
A credit agency falsely reports to five subscribers that a small private contractor filed for bankruptcy. The report concerns no public issue. Under Dun & Bradstreet v. Greenmoss Builders, what must the contractor prove to recover presumed and punitive damages?
Answer: Only the common law elements; actual malice is not constitutionally required
For a private plaintiff on a matter of purely private concern, the Constitution does not require actual malice for presumed or punitive damages.
Which oral statement is LEAST likely to count as slander per se?
Answer: "Tom is the rudest neighbor on the block."
Calling someone rude falls outside the per se categories (crime, loathsome disease, business or profession, unchastity), so special damages must be proven.
A newspaper prints: "According to unnamed sources, Mayor Lee accepted bribes." The accusation is false. Is the newspaper shielded because it attributed the claim to others?
Answer: No, one who repeats a defamatory statement is liable as if the original publisher
Under the republication rule, each person who repeats a defamatory statement is liable as a publisher, even with attribution.
A private investigator secretly puts a camera in a woman's bedroom but never shows the footage to anyone. Which tort is best established?
Answer: Intrusion upon seclusion
Intrusion upon seclusion requires a highly offensive intrusion into a private place and does not require publication.
A local scientist holds press conferences urging the city to ban a pesticide and later sues a critic for defamation over statements about her advocacy. She is most likely classified as:
Answer: A limited-purpose public figure
By voluntarily stepping into a particular public controversy, she became a limited-purpose public figure and must show actual malice for statements tied to that controversy.
While testifying in a civil trial, a witness falsely and knowingly says the defendant once embezzled from a charity, which is relevant to the case. The defendant sues the witness for defamation. Result?
Answer: The witness is protected by an absolute privilege
Statements made during judicial proceedings that relate to the case carry an absolute privilege, even when made with malice.
A soda company puts a famous athlete's photo on its cans without permission, suggesting he endorses the drink. Which claim fits best?
Answer: Appropriation of name or likeness
Using a person's name or likeness for commercial benefit without consent is appropriation.
How this page was made: written with AI tools and published by Nathan Beja, founder of Practice Test Geeks, who is responsible for its content. Exam facts are checked against the official sources listed below. Not reviewed by a subject-matter expert. Editorial policy
Sources & references
Exam facts on this page (fees, format, dates, passing scores) are checked against these official sources; the date is our last check. Editorial policy
- calbar.ca.gov — Eligibility, test dates, test delivery, exam format, fees, exam information · verified Oct 2026
- leginfo.legislature.ca.gov — Retake policy · verified Oct 2026