Crimes Against the Person (Non-Homicide) Flashcards
7 cards from real FYLSX practice questions. Tap to flip, then mark Knew It or Still Learning — missed cards come back until you master them.
Read the first 7 Crimes Against the Person (Non-Homicide) flashcards as text
Dan recklessly swings a baseball bat in a crowded bar to show off and strikes Vic in the arm. Dan did not intend to hit anyone. Is Dan guilty of battery?
Answer: Yes, because battery may be committed with criminal negligence or recklessness
Battery is a general intent crime that may be satisfied by reckless or criminally negligent conduct causing an unlawful touching.
Dan swings a fist at Vic, who is sound asleep, and misses. Vic never wakes up. Which crime has Dan most likely committed?
Answer: Assault of the attempted-battery type
Attempted-battery assault requires no victim awareness, only an intent to commit battery and a substantial step toward it.
During a heated argument, Dan clenches his fist and says, "If you weren't my brother, I'd knock you out right now." Has Dan committed assault?
Answer: No, because the words negated any threat of imminent harm
Words accompanying a gesture can negate the imminence required for apprehension-type assault.
Dan points an unloaded gun at Vic, who reasonably believes it is loaded and is terrified. Under the majority view, Dan is guilty of:
Answer: Assault, under the intent-to-frighten theory
Intentionally placing a victim in reasonable apprehension of imminent bodily harm is assault even without present ability.
In a fight, Dan intentionally bites off part of Vic's ear. Which crime best describes Dan's conduct at common law?
Answer: Mayhem
Common law mayhem is the malicious dismemberment or disablement of a bodily member, which includes permanent disfigurement in modern law.
Two amateur boxers fight in a sanctioned match, and one breaks the other's nose with a legal punch. Is the puncher guilty of battery?
Answer: No, because consent to contact within the rules of a lawful sport is a valid defense
Consent is a defense to battery when the contact occurs within the foreseeable rules of a lawful sporting event.
Which of the following would most likely elevate a simple battery to aggravated battery under modern statutes?
Answer: The defendant used a deadly weapon
Use of a deadly weapon, serious bodily injury, or a protected victim class typically aggravates battery.
How this page was made: written with AI tools and published by Nathan Beja, founder of Practice Test Geeks, who is responsible for its content. Exam facts are checked against the official sources listed below. Not reviewed by a subject-matter expert. Editorial policy
Sources & references
Exam facts on this page (fees, format, dates, passing scores) are checked against these official sources; the date is our last check. Editorial policy
- calbar.ca.gov — Eligibility, test dates, test delivery, exam format, fees, exam information · verified Oct 2026
- leginfo.legislature.ca.gov — Retake policy · verified Oct 2026