PSEE

FREE PSEE Logical Reasoning Question and Answers

0%

The following justification is insufficient:

All emails sent by a company are secure, according to the statement.

Therefore, every client request made by the company is secure.

Which of the following sentences completes the previous argument and establishes the validity of the conclusion?

Correct! Wrong!

Explanation:
The first choice completes the case and establishes the validity of the conclusion. This information is necessary for the conclusion to be valid. The second and third possibilities, however, do not follow the conclusion.

The hiring procedure for the accounting department is now complete, and a training session is being planned. Recently hired staff members are all highly qualified. The trainees are all recently engaged workers.
What conclusion is logically drawn from the information presented above?

Correct! Wrong!

Explanation:
All of the trainees are recently hired personnel who all possess a high level of qualification

Compared to black fish, silver fish can swim more quickly. Compared to black fish, the gold fish can swim more quickly. Compared to silver fish, the gold fish can swim more quickly. The third statement is: if the first two claims are accurate.

Correct! Wrong!

Explanation:
To make a choice, we don't have adequate information at this time. We don't sure, but it's possible that the gold fish can swim more quickly than both the silver and the black fish.

All information is useful information. Some websites are of little use. Some websites lack informative content. The third statement is: if the first two claims are accurate.

Correct! Wrong!

Explanation:
Given that the first statement contains the word "all" and the second statement uses the word "some," this is a powerful argument. And "some" is used in the conclusion.

Fall is when deciduous trees lose their leaves. All year long, conifers maintain their foliage. Deciduous conifers are trees. The third statement is: if the first two claims are accurate.

Correct! Wrong!

Explanation:
This argument is totally untrue.

Every rabbit has fur. Pet rabbits exist. Pets can have fur. The third statement is: if the first two claims are accurate.

Correct! Wrong!

Explanation:
Due to the usage of "some" in both the second assertion and the conclusion, this argument is a touch sloppy. It's a good point, though.

No homework is enjoyable. Homework includes reading. Not fun is reading. The third statement is: if the first two claims are accurate.

Correct! Wrong!

Explanation:
This is a powerful justification. The third assertion or conclusion must be true if the first two statements are accurate