FREE IA Bar Criminal Law and Procedure Questions and Answers
Which of the following defenses asserts that the defendant committed the act but should not be held criminally responsible due to a lack of mental capacity at the time of the offense?
The insanity defense asserts that the defendant committed the act but should not be held criminally responsible due to a lack of mental capacity at the time of the offense. This defense is based on the argument that the defendant was unable to understand the nature of their actions or distinguish right from wrong due to a mental illness.
What does the "Miranda warning" require law enforcement officers to inform a suspect of before interrogation?
The Miranda warning requires law enforcement officers to inform a suspect of their rights before interrogation, including the right to remain silent, the right to an attorney, and that anything said can be used against them in court. This warning is intended to protect the suspect’s Fifth Amendment rights against self-incrimination.
What is the standard of proof required for a conviction in a criminal case?
In a criminal case, the standard of proof required for a conviction is "beyond a reasonable doubt." This is the highest standard of proof in the legal system and requires that the evidence presented must be so convincing that there is no reasonable doubt of the defendant’s guilt.
Which of the following is NOT considered a fundamental right under the Sixth Amendment?
The right to remain silent is protected by the Fifth Amendment, not the Sixth. The Sixth Amendment guarantees the right to a speedy trial, an impartial jury, and the right to confront witnesses against you. The Fifth Amendment provides the right against self-incrimination, which includes the right to remain silent.
What is the legal principle that prevents a person from being tried twice for the same offense after an acquittal or conviction?
The Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution prohibits a person from being tried twice for the same offense after either an acquittal or conviction. This principle protects individuals from multiple prosecutions for the same crime.