I've been seeing a lot of confusion about passing scores for the RCC exam, so I wanted to share what I've researched and experienced.
The official minimum is typically 70%, but most successful candidates average around 80% on practice tests before sitting for the real thing. The practice test section tends to drag scores down because it's the most conceptually dense part of the exam.
I found that working through the rcc rcc compliance auditing and monitoring 2 consistently for two to three weeks gets most people into the passing zone. For deeper concept review, regulatory compliance certification filled in the gaps I had. The key isn't just doing more questions — it's reviewing every mistake and understanding the underlying principle.
Anyone who scored above 84%: what was your actual study timeline? Curious whether people who take more time consistently score higher or if there's a plateau effect.
Really helpful breakdown, thanks for sharing. I'm at week 4 of my RCC prep and the exam prep section is exactly where I'm struggling too. Going to try the approach you described and see if it moves my scores.
Good thread. One thing I'd add: don't try to cram the night before. I did 4 hours the night before my RCC and I think it hurt more than helped. Your brain needs consolidation time. Light review or full rest is better.
Same experience here. The rcc rcc compliance auditing and monitoring 2 was what finally made it click for me — specifically the way it explains the reasoning rather than just giving answers. Took me 4 weeks of consistent practice but scores went from 66% to 80% by exam day.
This is such a good point about the 70% minimum. I passed on my first attempt and honestly I think the biggest thing that helped me wasn't hitting some magic score on practice tests -- it was really digging into why I got questions wrong. Like if I missed something in the investigations section, I'd go back and figure out what concept I misunderstood, not just memorize the right answer. I found the free rcc investigations reporting and ethics questions really useful for that because there were enough of them to actually see patterns in my mistakes.
The 80% benchmark people mention is real but it depends on where you're scoring it. I was hitting 75-78% on some sets and still passed comfortably because I understood the material instead of just recognizing answers. If you're reviewing your wrong answers and you can explain exactly why the other options were wrong too, you're in much better shape than someone who's just chasing a number.
Just passed mine last month and honestly the thing that changed everything for me was stopping trying to memorize answers and actually understanding the reasoning behind each question. I was scoring 68-72% for weeks and couldn't figure out why I kept plateauing. Then I started writing out why the wrong answers were wrong, not just why the right one was right. That shift alone pushed me into the low 80s within two weeks.
Don't stress too hard about hitting exactly 70% on practice tests before you feel ready. If you're consistently in the 78-82% range you're probably more prepared than you think. The real exam felt harder in some spots and easier in others than my practice sets, which I wasn't expecting, but the overall difficulty evened out. Trust the process and don't cram the night before, it genuinely doesn't help.
Related Discussions
- Finally passed the CCCP last week — here's what actually moved the needle for me5 replies
- How close are ADA practice tests to the real exam? My honest review5 replies
- DeFi vs CeFi auditing — what does the CCA exam actually test?5 replies
- Which section of the ISACA is hardest? My breakdown after taking it5 replies
- Which section of the ARM is hardest? My breakdown after taking it5 replies