Certified Cicerone exam — failed the tasting component, retaking in 8 weeks

by tamara_w 39 views3 replies
T
tamara_wOP
May 23, 2026

Got my results last month. Written section was fine — 81%. Tasting evaluation is what sank me. Evaluator said my off-flavor identification was inconsistent and my style descriptors were too vague.

I work at a craft beer bar and taste beer every single day, so this stung. Turns out casual tasting and structured evaluative tasting are completely different skills. I could tell something was off but couldn't name it precisely.

Now I'm doing structured tasting sessions 4 times a week using spiked samples. Diacetyl, DMS, acetaldehyde — drilling these systematically. Anyone else had to retake specifically for the sensory component?

M
marcus_t
May 24, 2026

Retook for the same reason. The key is pairing flavor identification with mechanism — knowing DMS comes from SMM and inadequate boil helps you lock in the name.

N
nico_b
May 25, 2026

The style descriptor vagueness issue is real. Use the BJCP style guide language exactly — don't paraphrase. Evaluators are listening for specific vocabulary.

N
nico_b
May 26, 2026

Spiked sample kits from FlavorActiV are worth every cent for this kind of prep. Doing blind trials with a study partner made a huge difference for me.

Ready to practice?
Free CFPS practice tests with detailed explanations and instant results.
CFPS Practice Test

Join the Discussion

Sign in or register to reply with your account, or reply as a guest below.