← All EDAC Flashcard Decks

Objective Flashcards

5 cards from real EDAC practice questions. Tap to flip, then mark Knew It or Still Learning — missed cards come back until you master them.

Read the first 5 Objective flashcards as text
  1. As soon as the project scope is defined, which of the following should kick-off the research process?

    Answer: Identify research questions

    As soon as the project scope is clearly defined, the research process in evidence-based design should commence by identifying specific research questions. These questions serve as the foundation for the entire inquiry, guiding the literature review, data collection, and analysis. They articulate precisely what the project team needs to learn to make informed, evidence-based design decisions.

  2. A project team wants to make sure that the results of a patient satisfaction tool they developed within a healthcare setting have a high degree of external validity. What does external validity mean?

    Answer: The tool may be successfully used within other healthcare settings.

    External validity refers to the extent to which the results of a study or the utility of a tool can be generalized to other populations, settings, or times. If a patient satisfaction tool developed within one healthcare setting has a high degree of external validity, it means its findings and effectiveness are likely applicable and transferable to other similar healthcare settings, making it broadly useful.

  3. What is the PRIMARY benefit to conducting post-occupancy research?

    Answer: Testing the effects of design features on hypothesized outcomes.

    The primary benefit of conducting post-occupancy research (POE) is to empirically test whether the implemented design features actually achieved their hypothesized outcomes. POEs provide valuable, real-world data on how the built environment performs in use. This allows project teams to validate design decisions, understand their true impact on users and operations, and gain insights to inform future projects.

  4. During the design process, personnel participated in a visioning session to identify perceived problems and to develop design concepts. A literature review was conducted to see if credible evidence could be found to support the suggested improvements. The findings were discussed with the staff. What was the PRIMARY reason for doing this?

    Answer: To make an informed decision.

    The process of conducting visioning sessions, literature reviews, and staff discussions serves a primary purpose: to make informed decisions. By gathering input from personnel, reviewing credible evidence, and discussing findings, the project team ensures that design concepts are well-supported. This comprehensive approach leads to design choices that are based on both experiential knowledge and scientific research, resulting in better outcomes.

  5. A project team is interested in reducing patient falls and increasing staff satisfaction on an existing inpatient unit. There are a variety of design changes that could be made to achieve these goals. These include the installation of a non-slip type of flooring, a decentralized nurse station layout, and handrails in the patient room. Given the limited budget, what should the project team do FIRST to determine where to invest its limited resources?

    Answer: Conduct a critical review of the existing research for each option.

    Given a limited budget and multiple design options, the project team should first conduct a critical review of existing research for each proposed intervention. This step is fundamental to evidence-based design, as it helps identify which design features have the strongest empirical support for achieving desired outcomes like reducing patient falls or increasing staff satisfaction. This allows for informed resource allocation to the most effective solutions.

How this page was made: written with AI tools and published by Nathan Beja, founder of Practice Test Geeks, who is responsible for its content. Exam facts are checked against the official sources listed below. Not reviewed by a subject-matter expert. Editorial policy

Sources & references

Exam facts on this page (fees, format, dates, passing scores) are checked against these official sources; the date is our last check. Editorial policy

  1. assessments.meazurelearning.com — Renewal, score validity · verified Oct 2026
  2. healthdesign.org — Test delivery, test dates, eligibility, fees, passing score, retake fee, retake policy, score release, exam format, time limit · verified Oct 2026