Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety Flashcards

What is the hierarchy of controls for managing Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety risks?

Answer: Elimination, substitution, isolation, engineering, administrative, PPE — most to least effective

The hierarchy ranks controls from most effective (elimination) to least effective (PPE), guiding risk control decisions.

How often should Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety procedures be reviewed?

Answer: Regularly, after incidents, when conditions change, or when new information emerges

Procedures must be living documents, reviewed regularly and in response to changes, incidents, and new knowledge.

What consultation requirements exist for Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety under WHS law?

Answer: Workers must be consulted on matters affecting their health and safety, with genuine opportunity to provide input

WHS law requires genuine consultation with workers on matters affecting their safety, including through HSRs and committees.

What emergency procedures should cover Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety scenarios?

Answer: Response actions, evacuation, first aid, communication protocols, and specific hazard responses

Emergency procedures must be comprehensive and specific to the hazards associated with the activity.

What penalties apply for non-compliance with Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety regulations in Australia?

Answer: Significant fines (up to millions of AUD for corporations) and potential imprisonment for serious offences

Australian WHS penalties are severe, with Category 1 offences carrying fines up to AUD 3 million and potential imprisonment.

What is the role of PPE in managing Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety risks?

Answer: PPE is the last line of defence, used only when higher-level controls are not reasonably practicable

PPE is the least effective control in the hierarchy and should only be relied upon when other controls cannot adequately reduce the risk.