CT Bar Reexamination 4

Question 1

A party fails to object during reexamination when opposing counsel exceeds the proper scope. On appeal, the issue is reviewed under:

Accepted Answer

Plain error standard due to the failure to object below

Answer

Failure to object at trial limits appellate review to plain error, requiring a showing of obvious error affecting substantial rights.

Question 2

In Connecticut, may a party recall a witness for additional direct examination after both sides have rested?

Accepted Answer

Only with leave of court and a showing of good cause

Answer

Recalling a witness after both parties rest requires court permission and a sufficient showing of need or good cause.

Question 3

Which scenario appropriately limits reexamination in a Connecticut bench trial?

Accepted Answer

A judge may end reexamination when it becomes repetitive or cumulative

Answer

Connecticut judges — in both bench and jury trials — may terminate redundant or cumulative examination to promote efficient proceedings.

Question 4

An attorney attempts redirect examination but forgot to ask about an important topic on direct. The court in Connecticut will most likely:

Accepted Answer

Restrict redirect to cross-examination topics only

Answer

Redirect is not a remedy for incomplete direct; courts limit redirect to matters actually raised on cross-examination.

Question 5

During reexamination in a Connecticut criminal trial, the prosecutor introduces evidence of a collateral matter not raised on cross. Defense counsel objects. The court should:

Accepted Answer

Sustain the objection because redirect must be limited to cross-examination scope

Answer

Even in criminal trials, redirect is bounded by cross-examination scope; collateral matters not raised on cross are outside redirect's proper purpose.

(CT Bar) Connecticut Bar Exam Practice Test

(CT Bar) Connecticut Bar Exam Practice Test

CT Bar Reexamination 4