CT Bar Reexamination 2

Question 1

Under Connecticut rules, redirect examination is limited to what scope?

Accepted Answer

Matters raised on cross-examination

Answer

Any relevant matter not yet covered

Answer

Only new evidence discovered after direct

Answer

Whatever the court permits without restriction

Question 2

After redirect examination in a Connecticut civil trial, the opposing party may conduct:

Accepted Answer

Recross-examination limited to redirect scope

Answer

A full new cross-examination on any topic

Answer

No further examination without court permission

Answer

A second direct examination if the court allows

Question 3

A witness was impeached on cross with a prior inconsistent statement. On redirect, counsel may properly:

Accepted Answer

Have the witness explain or clarify the inconsistency

Answer

Introduce entirely new corroborating evidence

Answer

Re-read the prior statement to rehabilitate credibility

Answer

Call a separate witness to vouch for the first witness

Question 4

In Connecticut, which statement correctly describes the trial court's authority over reexamination?

Accepted Answer

Courts may allow further examination beyond scope for good cause

Answer

Courts have no discretion; reexamination is an absolute right

Answer

Courts must allow unlimited rounds of examination

Answer

Only appellate courts may limit reexamination scope

Question 5

A party calls an expert witness. On cross, opposing counsel questions the expert's methodology. The proper redirect purpose is to:

Accepted Answer

Rehabilitate the expert by addressing the methodology challenge

Answer

Introduce new expert opinions not raised on direct

Answer

Replace the expert with a more credible substitute

Answer

Move to strike all cross-examination testimony

Question 6

When a witness volunteers information beyond the redirect question, the trial court in Connecticut should:

Accepted Answer

Strike the non-responsive portion on opposing party's objection

Answer

Allow it because the witness controls their own testimony

Answer

Automatically declare a mistrial for procedural violation

Answer

Permit it since redirect has no scope limitations

Question 7

A Connecticut court refuses to allow redirect examination after cross-examination. On appeal, the standard of review is:

Accepted Answer

Abuse of discretion, because the trial court controls examination

Answer

De novo, because examination rights are constitutional

Answer

Harmless error per se, requiring automatic reversal

Answer

Plain error, applied only when no objection was made below