Ethical and Professional Responsibility Flashcards
6 cards from real CRSS practice questions. Tap to flip, then mark Knew It or Still Learning — missed cards come back until you master them.
Read the first 6 Ethical and Professional Responsibility flashcards as text
A Certified Recovery Support Specialist (CRSS) is working with a peer who reveals they have been having thoughts of harming their roommate. The peer asks the CRSS to keep this information confidential. What is the CRSS's most appropriate ethical responsibility in this situation?
Answer: Consult with a supervisor and follow mandatory reporting laws regarding imminent harm.
While confidentiality is a cornerstone of the peer relationship, it has limits. The CRSS has a duty to protect individuals from serious, foreseeable, and imminent harm. In this scenario, the ethical obligation to prevent harm overrides the principle of confidentiality. The correct procedure involves seeking supervision and adhering to legal and organizational requirements for reporting such threats.
Which of the following best describes the primary purpose of establishing and maintaining professional boundaries in a peer support relationship?
Answer: To ensure the relationship remains professional, protecting both the peer and the CRSS from potential harm or exploitation.
Professional boundaries are essential to create a safe, ethical, and effective support environment. They define the limits of the relationship, preventing role confusion, emotional over-involvement, and potential exploitation, thereby protecting the well-being of both the person being served and the recovery specialist.
A peer you have been supporting for several months asks you to become their sponsor in a 12-step program. This situation is an example of:
Answer: A dual relationship.
A dual relationship occurs when a professional has a second, different type of relationship with a person they serve. In this case, the CRSS would be both a paid peer support specialist and a 12-step sponsor, which can blur boundaries, create a conflict of interest, and impair professional judgment. Ethical guidelines generally advise against such relationships to protect the integrity of the professional support being provided.
According to the CRSS code of ethics, when is it appropriate for a specialist to share aspects of their own recovery story?
Answer: Only when it is done to provide hope and is not prescriptive.
The CRSS code of ethics emphasizes that self-disclosure should be purposeful and beneficial to the person being served. The goal is to instill hope, show empathy, and normalize experiences without prescribing a specific path, always respecting that each individual's recovery journey is unique.
A CRSS works in a small, rural community and discovers that a new peer assigned to them is their child's teacher. To ethically manage this situation, what is the CRSS's BEST first step?
Answer: Acknowledge the dual relationship with the peer and a supervisor to discuss boundaries and potential conflicts of interest.
In some situations, particularly in small communities, dual relationships may be unavoidable. The most ethical approach is to address the situation transparently with both the peer and a supervisor. This allows for a discussion of boundaries, potential conflicts, and a collaborative decision on whether the professional relationship can proceed ethically or if a referral is necessary.
Which of the following actions falls outside the appropriate scope of practice for a Certified Recovery Support Specialist?
Answer: Providing a clinical diagnosis for a co-occurring mental health condition.
A CRSS provides non-clinical, peer-based recovery support. Making a clinical diagnosis is a function reserved for licensed medical or mental health professionals, such as a psychiatrist, psychologist, or licensed clinical social worker. Acting outside one's scope of practice is an ethical violation.
How this page was made: written with AI tools and published by Nathan Beja, founder of Practice Test Geeks, who is responsible for its content. Exam facts are checked against the official sources listed below. Not reviewed by a subject-matter expert. Editorial policy
Sources & references
Exam facts on this page (fees, format, dates, passing scores) are checked against these official sources; the date is our last check. Editorial policy
- iaodapca.org — Renewal, test delivery, exam format, passing score, retake policy, score release, time limit, score validity, fees · verified Oct 2026