Research Integrity & Scientific Misconduct Flashcards
7 cards from real CRS practice questions. Tap to flip, then mark Knew It or Still Learning — missed cards come back until you master them.
Read the first 7 Research Integrity & Scientific Misconduct flashcards as text
Self-plagiarism in academic research is best defined as:
Answer: Reusing one's own previously published work without appropriate disclosure or attribution
Self-plagiarism occurs when researchers reuse substantial portions of their own prior publications without disclosing the overlap, misleading readers about the originality of the work.
According to ICMJE guidelines, all of the following criteria must be met to qualify as an author EXCEPT:
Answer: Funding acquisition as the primary grant holder for the study
ICMJE authorship requires intellectual contribution, drafting/revision, final approval, and accountability — funding acquisition alone does not qualify someone for authorship.
Ghost authorship refers to a situation where:
Answer: A person who made significant intellectual contributions is not listed as an author
Ghost authorship occurs when someone who made substantial contributions to a study is excluded from the author list, often to conceal industry involvement or conflicts of interest.
A retraction notice in a scientific journal is issued primarily to:
Answer: Formally withdraw a published article due to major errors, misconduct, or irreproducible results
Retraction formally removes a flawed or fraudulent article from the scientific record, signaling to readers that the work should not be relied upon.
P-hacking (also called data dredging) in research refers to:
Answer: Conducting multiple analyses or trying different statistical approaches until a significant result is found
P-hacking involves conducting numerous analyses or manipulating approaches until a p-value below the threshold is achieved, inflating the false-positive rate and undermining reproducibility.
Honorary (gift) authorship violates research integrity primarily because it:
Answer: Misrepresents who actually contributed to the research and undermines accountability
Honorary authorship falsely attributes credit and responsibility to individuals who did not meet authorship criteria, distorting the scientific record and undermining accountability.
When a researcher discovers a non-fraudulent error in their own published paper that does not affect the main conclusions, the appropriate response is to:
Answer: Publish a correction notice (erratum) through the journal
An erratum or correction notice is the appropriate mechanism for transparently disclosing and correcting honest errors in published work that do not constitute misconduct.
How this page was made: written with AI tools and published by Nathan Beja, founder of Practice Test Geeks, who is responsible for its content. Exam facts are checked against the official sources listed below. Not reviewed by a subject-matter expert. Editorial policy
Sources & references
Exam facts on this page (fees, format, dates, passing scores) are checked against these official sources; the date is our last check. Editorial policy
- research.uams.edu — Eligibility, renewal, exam format, passing score, score release · verified Oct 2026