Financial Management & Grant Funding Flashcards
6 cards from real CRP practice questions. Tap to flip, then mark Knew It or Still Learning — missed cards come back until you master them.
Read the first 6 Financial Management & Grant Funding flashcards as text
What is a 'net cost per ton' calculation in recycling program financial management?
Answer: Total program operating costs minus commodity revenues, divided by total tons recycled — representing the true municipal subsidy per ton
Net cost per ton subtracts commodity revenues from gross operating costs and divides by recycled tonnage, showing the actual taxpayer or program cost to recycle each ton.
Which federal agency administers the Solid Waste Infrastructure for Recycling (SWIFR) grants that fund recycling program improvements?
Answer: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
The EPA's Solid Waste Infrastructure for Recycling (SWIFR) grant program, funded through the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, provides grants to states, tribes, and communities to improve recycling systems.
A recycling program's total annual operating cost is $1.2M and it receives $320,000 in commodity revenue. If the program recycles 4,000 tons per year, what is the net cost per ton?
Answer: $220 per ton
Net cost = ($1,200,000 - $320,000) / 4,000 tons = $880,000 / 4,000 = $220 per ton.
What is 'avoided cost' and how is it used to justify recycling program expenditures?
Answer: The disposal cost (tipping fee × tons diverted) that would have been paid if recyclables had been sent to landfill instead, demonstrating the economic value of diversion
Avoided cost calculates the tipping fees and landfill costs that recycling prevented, providing a tangible financial offset that helps justify recycling program expenditures to budget decision-makers.
When writing a grant application for recycling infrastructure funding, which element is most critical to demonstrate program impact?
Answer: Quantifiable metrics: tons diverted, diversion rate improvement, households served, and cost-per-ton reduction
Grant reviewers evaluate impact through measurable outcomes — funders need quantifiable before/after metrics to assess whether the investment will produce meaningful, verifiable results.
Under an Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) framework for packaging, who typically funds the recycling system?
Answer: Producers and brand owners who place packaging on the market, through fees paid to a producer responsibility organization (PRO)
EPR shifts financial responsibility to producers by requiring them to pay into a PRO that funds collection, processing, and end-market development for packaging materials they sell.