← All CPCM Flashcard Decks

Certified Professional Contract Manager: Contract Law and Legal Frameworks Flashcards

7 cards from real CPCM practice questions. Tap to flip, then mark Knew It or Still Learning — missed cards come back until you master them.

Read the first 7 Certified Professional Contract Manager: Contract Law and Legal Frameworks flashcards as text
  1. Under the UCC Article 2, a merchant's firm offer is irrevocable for up to how long without consideration?

    Answer: 3 months

    UCC §2-205 makes a merchant's signed, written firm offer irrevocable for the stated period or a reasonable time, but no longer than three months.

  2. Which doctrine allows a court to refuse enforcement of an unconscionable contract clause even if both parties agreed to it?

    Answer: Unconscionability

    Unconscionability under UCC §2-302 and common law allows courts to refuse enforcement of terms that are oppressively one-sided or shock the conscience.

  3. In contract law, what is the 'mailbox rule'?

    Answer: Acceptance is effective when dispatched by the offeree

    The mailbox rule (deposited acceptance rule) holds that acceptance is effective at the moment it is properly dispatched, not when received.

  4. A contractor claims additional compensation citing a cardinal change to the contract scope. What distinguishes a cardinal change from an ordinary change order?

    Answer: A cardinal change alters the work so drastically it falls outside the original contract scope

    A cardinal change so fundamentally alters the contract that it constitutes a breach, entitling the contractor to rescission or breach damages rather than just equitable adjustment.

  5. Which legal theory allows recovery for unjust enrichment when no valid contract exists?

    Answer: Quantum meruit

    Quantum meruit ('as much as deserved') is a quasi-contractual remedy allowing recovery of the reasonable value of services rendered to prevent unjust enrichment.

  6. What is the legal effect of a 'no damages for delay' clause in a government contract?

    Answer: It limits the contractor's remedy for owner-caused delay to time extensions only

    No-damages-for-delay clauses restrict a contractor's remedy for owner-caused delays to time extensions, precluding monetary compensation, though exceptions exist for active interference or bad faith.

  7. Under the Restatement (Second) of Contracts, a misrepresentation makes a contract voidable when it is:

    Answer: Fraudulent or material, and the recipient justifiably relied on it

    Per Restatement §164, a misrepresentation voids a contract when it is either fraudulent or material AND the recipient justifiably relied on it in entering the contract.

How this page was made: written with AI tools and published by Nathan Beja, founder of Practice Test Geeks, who is responsible for its content. Exam facts are checked against the official sources listed below. Not reviewed by a subject-matter expert. Editorial policy

Sources & references

Exam facts on this page (fees, format, dates, passing scores) are checked against these official sources; the date is our last check. Editorial policy

  1. ncmahq.org — Test delivery, exam format, passing score, renewal, retake policy, score release, time limit, score validity, fees, test dates · verified Oct 2026