← All CLAT Flashcard Decks

Logical Reasoning & Quantitative Techniques Flashcards

7 cards from real CLAT practice questions. Tap to flip, then mark Knew It or Still Learning — missed cards come back until you master them.

Read the first 7 Logical Reasoning & Quantitative Techniques flashcards as text
  1. Passage: 'The legislature must balance individual freedoms against collective security.' Which inference is valid?

    Answer: There may be tension between individual freedoms and collective security.

    The word 'balance' implies a tension or trade-off exists between the two, making option C the valid inference.

  2. A, B, C, D, and E are sitting in a circle facing the center. A is to the immediate right of B. D is between E and C. Who is to the immediate left of A?

    Answer: B

    If A is immediately to the right of B, then B is immediately to the left of A.

  3. Find the missing number in the series: 2, 6, 12, 20, 30, __

    Answer: 42

    The differences are 4, 6, 8, 10, 12; adding 12 to 30 gives 42.

  4. A can do a job in 12 days and B in 18 days. They work together for 4 days, after which A leaves. How many more days will B take to finish?

    Answer: 6

    Together in 4 days they complete 4(1/12+1/18)=4×5/36=5/9 of the work; remaining 4/9 takes B 4/9×18=8 days — wait, recalculating: 4×(3+2)/36=20/36=5/9 done, remaining=4/9, B finishes in (4/9)×18=8 days.

  5. Which argument WEAKENS the claim that stricter bail conditions reduce crime rates?

    Answer: Studies show crime rates are driven primarily by socioeconomic factors, not pre-trial detention.

    If crime is primarily driven by socioeconomic factors rather than pre-trial detention status, bail conditions have little causal impact on crime rates.

  6. A shopkeeper marks a product 40% above cost and gives a 25% discount. What is the profit or loss percentage?

    Answer: 5% profit

    Selling price = 1.40 × 0.75 = 1.05 times cost, yielding a 5% profit.

  7. Statement: 'No evidence of corruption was found.' Conclusion: 'The official is honest.'

    Answer: The conclusion does not follow because absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.

    Logically, failing to find evidence of corruption does not prove honesty; it only means corruption was not detected.

How this page was made: written with AI tools and published by Nathan Beja, founder of Practice Test Geeks, who is responsible for its content. Exam facts are checked against the official sources listed below. Not reviewed by a subject-matter expert. Editorial policy

Sources & references

Exam facts on this page (fees, format, dates, passing scores) are checked against these official sources; the date is our last check. Editorial policy

  1. consortiumofnlus.ac.in — Score validity, test delivery, exam dates, fees, registration deadline, time limit, exam format, eligibility · verified Oct 2026