Regulatory Compliance & Legal Framework Flashcards
7 cards from real CFP practice questions. Tap to flip, then mark Knew It or Still Learning — missed cards come back until you master them.
Read the first 7 Regulatory Compliance & Legal Framework flashcards as text
A non-compete clause in a personal trainer's employment contract is most commonly intended to prevent the trainer from:
Answer: Working for competing fitness businesses or soliciting clients after leaving
Non-compete clauses restrict trainers from working for competitors or stealing clients for a defined time and geographic area after employment ends.
A personal trainer who is found liable for negligence caused a client's injury. The legal concept of 'proximate cause' requires proving that:
Answer: The trainer's breach of duty directly and foreseeably caused the client's harm
Proximate cause links the trainer's specific breach of duty to the client's injury, requiring that the harm was a foreseeable result of the negligent act.
Sexual harassment in a fitness facility is regulated under which federal law?
Answer: Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act prohibits workplace discrimination and harassment based on sex, covering sexual harassment in employment settings including fitness facilities.
When a fitness professional recommends a client see a physician due to exercise-related symptoms, this practice is best described as:
Answer: Appropriate referral within scope of practice
Referring clients to qualified medical professionals when symptoms exceed the trainer's scope is a core professional and ethical responsibility.
A fitness facility's policies on equipment sanitation and hygiene may be subject to oversight by:
Answer: State or local health departments
State and local health departments typically regulate sanitation, hygiene, and safety standards in commercial fitness facilities.
A trainer is sued after a client falls from a treadmill. The client is found to be 30% at fault for ignoring safety warnings. In a pure comparative negligence state, the client's damage award would be:
Answer: Reduced by 30%, allowing the client to recover 70% of damages
Under pure comparative negligence, a plaintiff's damages are reduced proportionally by their percentage of fault — here, 30% — allowing partial recovery.
A personal trainer's failure to perform CPR during a cardiac emergency when trained and certified to do so could result in liability for:
Answer: Negligence by omission (failure to act)
A certified trainer has a legal duty to act within their training during emergencies; failing to perform CPR when capable constitutes negligence by omission.