← All CFL Flashcard Decks

Securities Law & Regulatory Compliance Flashcards

6 cards from real CFL practice questions. Tap to flip, then mark Knew It or Still Learning — missed cards come back until you master them.

Read the first 6 Securities Law & Regulatory Compliance flashcards as text
  1. In securities litigation, 'loss causation' requires the plaintiff to demonstrate that:

    Answer: The fraudulent misstatement caused the economic loss suffered

    Dura Pharmaceuticals v. Broudo held that plaintiffs must prove the alleged fraud caused the actual investment loss, not merely that they paid an inflated price.

  2. Under SEC Rule 10b5-1, an insider can establish an affirmative defense to insider trading by:

    Answer: Entering into a pre-planned trading arrangement before becoming aware of material non-public information

    Rule 10b5-1 plans allow insiders to establish trading plans when not in possession of MNPI, providing an affirmative defense for trades executed under the plan.

  3. The SEC's enforcement authority under Section 21(d) of the Exchange Act allows it to seek all of the following EXCEPT:

    Answer: Criminal incarceration directly through SEC proceedings

    The SEC can seek civil penalties and disgorgement but cannot directly impose criminal sanctions—criminal charges must be referred to the DOJ.

  4. Which doctrine holds that a tippee who receives material non-public information from an insider can be liable for insider trading if the tipper received a personal benefit?

    Answer: The Dirks tipper-tippee liability doctrine

    In Dirks v. SEC, the Supreme Court held that tippee liability flows from the tipper's breach of fiduciary duty, which requires the tipper to have received a personal benefit.

  5. A financial litigator representing a company in an SEC enforcement action would most likely assert which defense to a disgorgement order when the company's profits are difficult to trace?

    Answer: Lack of a sufficient causal nexus between the violation and the profits

    Courts require a causal connection between the violation and the profits subject to disgorgement; attenuated or unrelated gains may be excluded.

  6. Under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Section 304, a CEO or CFO must reimburse the company for bonuses and profits from stock sales if the company is required to restate its financials due to:

    Answer: Misconduct resulting in material noncompliance with financial reporting requirements

    SOX Section 304 clawback applies when the restatement results from material noncompliance caused by misconduct, not mere accounting errors.

How this page was made: written with AI tools and published by Nathan Beja, founder of Practice Test Geeks, who is responsible for its content. Exam facts are checked against the official sources listed below. Not reviewed by a subject-matter expert. Editorial policy

Sources & references

Exam facts on this page (fees, format, dates, passing scores) are checked against these official sources; the date is our last check. Editorial policy

  1. members.aacfl.org — Eligibility, retake policy, time limit, exam information · verified Oct 2026
  2. aacfl.org — Test delivery, fees, eligibility · verified Oct 2026
Securities Law & Regulatory Compliance Flashcards — CFL Study Cards with Answers