CVA Litigation Support and Expert Testimony Flashcards
6 cards from real Certified Valuation Analyst practice questions. Tap to flip, then mark Knew It or Still Learning — missed cards come back until you master them.
Read the first 6 CVA Litigation Support and Expert Testimony flashcards as text
In U.S. federal courts, the admissibility of expert testimony is governed primarily by:
Answer: Federal Rule of Evidence 702 and the Daubert standard
FRE 702 and the Daubert trilogy require that expert testimony be based on sufficient facts, reliable methodology, and proper application to the case facts.
Under the Daubert standard, a judge evaluating a valuation expert's methodology may consider:
Answer: Whether the methodology has been tested, peer-reviewed, and has a known error rate
Daubert factors include testability, peer review, known error rate, and general acceptance in the relevant professional community.
A CVA retained as a 'consulting expert' (non-testifying) in litigation:
Answer: Is typically protected from discovery and helps counsel understand valuation issues
Consulting experts are generally shielded from discovery under FRCP 26(b)(4)(D) and serve to advise counsel rather than present opinions to the court.
The 'reasonable certainty' standard applied to damages in business litigation generally requires that:
Answer: The fact of damages must be proven with certainty, but the amount may be estimated with reasonable probability
Courts distinguish between certainty of the existence of harm (required) and precision of the amount (reasonable probability suffices), giving experts flexibility in methodology.
Lost profits damages in a breach of contract case are typically calculated using which framework?
Answer: But-for revenues minus actual revenues, less saved costs, discounted to present value if future losses are included
Lost profits are measured as the difference between what the plaintiff would have earned 'but for' the breach and what it actually earned, net of mitigated or avoided costs.
Which of the following is a key distinction between 'lost profits' and 'lost business value' as damages theories?
Answer: Lost profits compensate for a finite stream of lost earnings; lost business value compensates for permanent destruction of the going concern
Courts generally do not allow double recovery; lost profits apply when the business survives but profits are temporarily impaired, while lost business value applies when the enterprise is destroyed.
How this page was made: written with AI tools and published by Nathan Beja, founder of Practice Test Geeks, who is responsible for its content. Exam facts are checked against the official sources listed below. Not reviewed by a subject-matter expert. Editorial policy
Sources & references
Exam facts on this page (fees, format, dates, passing scores) are checked against these official sources; the date is our last check. Editorial policy
- nacva.com — Score validity, eligibility, time limit, passing score, test delivery, exam format, late registration, retake fee, retake policy, score release · verified Nov 2026