Risk Allocation Flashcards
7 cards from real CCNP practice questions. Tap to flip, then mark Knew It or Still Learning — missed cards come back until you master them.
Read the first 7 Risk Allocation flashcards as text
A 'cap on liability' negotiated at 100% of the contract value means that:
Answer: The contractor's maximum liability for all claims equals the total contract price
A liability cap at 100% of contract value limits the contractor's total exposure for all claims to an amount equal to the full contract price, regardless of the magnitude of losses caused.
Risk 'retention' as a deliberate strategy in contract negotiation is most appropriate when:
Answer: Insurance premiums would exceed the expected cost of the risk
Retaining risk is economically rational when the cost of transferring it (through insurance or contract provisions) exceeds the expected value of the losses that retention would expose the party to.
A 'parent company guarantee' in a contract serves to allocate credit risk by:
Answer: Making the parent corporation a backstop obligor if the subsidiary fails to perform
A parent company guarantee backstops the subsidiary's financial obligations with the parent's creditworthiness, giving the counterparty recourse against a stronger entity if the subsidiary defaults.
The 'first dollar coverage' concept in insurance allocation means:
Answer: Coverage applies from the first dollar of loss with no deductible or self-insured retention
First dollar coverage means the insurer covers losses from the first dollar, with no deductible or self-insured retention required from the policyholder.
In technology contracts, a 'service level agreement' (SLA) with financial credits for downtime primarily functions as:
Answer: A pre-negotiated, capped form of liquidated damages for service failures
SLA credits are a form of pre-agreed liquidated damages, providing the customer automatic, formula-based compensation for service failures without requiring proof of actual loss.
Which allocation approach is best suited for 'black swan' risks—low probability, catastrophic impact events—in major infrastructure contracts?
Answer: Shared risk with owner-held contingency reserves and contractor force majeure protections
Black swan events are best handled through shared risk structures—owner contingency reserves absorb unforeseeable losses while force majeure protections excuse contractor non-performance for truly extraordinary events.
A 'most favored customer' (MFC) clause in a supply contract primarily mitigates the buyer's risk of:
Answer: Paying a higher price than the supplier charges other comparable customers
MFC clauses ensure the buyer receives pricing at least as favorable as the supplier's best comparable customer, protecting against the risk of being disadvantaged relative to competitors.
How this page was made: written with AI tools and published by Nathan Beja, founder of Practice Test Geeks, who is responsible for its content. We have not yet matched this exam's facts to an official source, so confirm fees, dates and rules with the exam body. Not reviewed by a subject-matter expert. Editorial policy