← All CAS BAR Flashcard Decks

CAS Bar Civil Procedure Flashcards

6 cards from real CAS BAR practice questions. Tap to flip, then mark Knew It or Still Learning — missed cards come back until you master them.

Read the first 6 CAS Bar Civil Procedure flashcards as text
  1. Under California's anti-SLAPP statute (CCP §425.16), a defendant may file a special motion to strike a complaint when the claims arise from:

    Answer: Protected activity in connection with a public issue

    CCP §425.16 allows a special motion to strike claims arising from acts in furtherance of the defendant's right of petition or free speech on a public issue.

  2. Which of the following correctly states the standard for granting summary judgment in California?

    Answer: There is no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law

    Summary judgment is granted when no triable issue of material fact exists and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law under CCP §437c.

  3. In California civil litigation, mandatory electronic filing (e-filing) in superior courts is governed by local rules and:

    Answer: CCP §1010.6, which authorizes e-filing statewide

    CCP §1010.6 is the primary statute authorizing and regulating electronic filing in California superior courts.

  4. A California court may dismiss a case for lack of prosecution under the mandatory dismissal rule if it has not been brought to trial within:

    Answer: 5 years of filing

    CCP §583.310 requires that a California civil action be brought to trial within 5 years of filing or it must be dismissed.

  5. Under California civil procedure, a party who fails to respond to properly served interrogatories may face which of the following consequences?

    Answer: Waiver of objections and a court order compelling responses

    Failure to timely respond to interrogatories results in waiver of objections, and the propounding party may move for an order compelling responses and sanctions.

  6. In a California civil case, collateral estoppel (issue preclusion) prevents relitigation of an issue when:

    Answer: The issue was actually litigated, necessarily decided, and the party against whom it is asserted had a full and fair opportunity to litigate

    Collateral estoppel requires that the issue was actually litigated, necessarily decided, and that the party had a full and fair opportunity to litigate it in the prior proceeding.

How this page was made: written with AI tools and published by Nathan Beja, founder of Practice Test Geeks, who is responsible for its content. Exam facts are checked against the official sources listed below. Not reviewed by a subject-matter expert. Editorial policy

Sources & references

Exam facts on this page (fees, format, dates, passing scores) are checked against these official sources; the date is our last check. Editorial policy

  1. calbar.ca.gov — Score release, passing score, exam dates, exam information · verified Oct 2026