← All ABP Flashcard Decks

Biostatistics and Evidence-Based Literature Appraisal Flashcards

7 cards from real ABP practice questions. Tap to flip, then mark Knew It or Still Learning — missed cards come back until you master them.

Read the first 7 Biostatistics and Evidence-Based Literature Appraisal flashcards as text
  1. A periodontal RCT reports 20% of control patients and 10% of test patients had recurrent pocket depth ≥5 mm. What is the number needed to treat (NNT)?

    Answer: 10

    ARR = 20% − 10% = 10%, so NNT = 1/0.10 = 10.

  2. A 95% confidence interval for a mean attachment gain difference is −0.2 to 1.4 mm. What can be concluded at α = 0.05?

    Answer: The difference is not statistically significant

    The interval includes 0 (no difference), so the result is not statistically significant.

  3. Which test is most appropriate to compare mean probing depth reduction among three independent treatment groups with normally distributed data?

    Answer: One-way ANOVA

    One-way ANOVA compares means across three or more independent groups.

  4. In a split-mouth design for evaluating a graft material, which analysis is generally appropriate?

    Answer: Paired analysis accounting for within-patient correlation

    Sites within the same patient are correlated, so paired or mixed-model analysis is needed.

  5. What is the main purpose of intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis?

    Answer: To preserve randomization and reduce attrition bias

    ITT analyzes participants in the groups to which they were randomized, preserving the balance achieved by randomization.

  6. Which statistic best describes agreement between two examiners' categorical furcation classifications beyond chance?

    Answer: Cohen's kappa

    Cohen's kappa measures inter-rater agreement corrected for chance.

  7. A Type II error in a clinical trial means:

    Answer: Failing to reject a false null hypothesis

    A Type II (beta) error is missing a real difference; power equals 1 − beta.

How this page was made: written with AI tools and published by Nathan Beja, founder of Practice Test Geeks, who is responsible for its content. Exam facts are checked against the official sources listed below. Not reviewed by a subject-matter expert. Editorial policy

Sources & references

Exam facts on this page (fees, format, dates, passing scores) are checked against these official sources; the date is our last check. Editorial policy

  1. abperio.org — Test delivery, exam dates, fees, exam format, registration deadline, score release, time limit, retake fee, retake policy, score validity · verified Nov 2026
  2. pearsonvue.com — Registration · verified Nov 2026