← All Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal Flashcard Decks

Identifying Logical Fallacies Questions and Answers Flashcards

6 cards from real Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal practice questions. Tap to flip, then mark Knew It or Still Learning — missed cards come back until you master them.

Read the first 6 Identifying Logical Fallacies Questions and Answers flashcards as text
  1. Argument: 'Either we invest massively in military spending, or we will be invaded by foreign powers.' What fallacy does this commit?

    Answer: False dilemma — it presents only two options when many middle-ground positions exist.

    The argument presents only two extreme options (massive investment or invasion) while ignoring moderate defense strategies, alliances, diplomacy, and other security approaches.

  2. Argument: 'This must be a good wine — it won the International Wine Competition in 2019.' What fallacy might this commit?

    Answer: Appeal to authority — the award is treated as sufficient proof of quality without broader evidence.

    A competition award is an authority's judgment — treating it as definitive proof of quality relies on appeal to authority without considering subjective taste, context of competition, or vintage variation.

  3. A politician says: 'My opponent voted against increasing police budgets, which shows he doesn't care about public safety.' What fallacy is this?

    Answer: Straw man — it misrepresents the opponent's position to make it easier to attack.

    The opponent's vote against budget increases may reflect a preference for alternative public safety approaches (community programs, mental health services) — the politician unfairly characterizes this as not caring about safety.

  4. Argument: 'Thousands of people have bought this supplement, so it must be effective.' What fallacy does this commit?

    Answer: Ad populum (bandwagon fallacy) — popularity is used as evidence of effectiveness.

    The number of buyers reflects marketing success, price, and accessibility, not clinical effectiveness — popularity does not establish efficacy.

  5. Statement: 'We shouldn't take Dr. Lee's research on climate change seriously — she drives a large SUV.' What fallacy is this?

    Answer: Tu quoque (appeal to hypocrisy) — attacking the person's behavior to discredit their argument.

    Tu quoque dismisses an argument by pointing to the speaker's allegedly hypocritical behavior, rather than addressing the substance of the research.

  6. Argument: 'Alternative medicine has been practiced for thousands of years, which proves it is effective.' What type of fallacy is this?

    Answer: Appeal to tradition — long historical use is treated as proof of effectiveness.

    Many practices have been used for centuries that were later proven ineffective or harmful — historical longevity does not establish clinical efficacy.