UT Bar Multistate Bar 2

Question 1

A homeowner offers a painter $5,000 to paint her house, stating the offer can be accepted only by completing the job. The painter finishes half the house when the homeowner attempts to revoke. What is the painter's best argument that revocation is ineffective?

Accepted Answer

Beginning performance of a unilateral contract makes the offer irrevocable as an option

Answer

Under the modern rule, beginning performance of a unilateral contract creates an option contract, making the offer irrevocable while performance continues.

Question 2

A defendant is charged with burglary. At trial, the prosecution offers evidence that the defendant committed a similar burglary two years earlier using an identical rare method of entry. This evidence is most likely admissible to prove:

Accepted Answer

Identity through a distinctive modus operandi

Answer

Under FRE 404(b), prior crimes are inadmissible to show propensity but admissible for non-character purposes such as identity via a signature modus operandi.

Question 3

A state statute requires all commercial trucks operating within the state to use a specially contoured mudguard, though straight mudguards are legal in all neighboring states. The statute's most serious constitutional vulnerability is that it:

Accepted Answer

Imposes an undue burden on interstate commerce under the dormant Commerce Clause

Answer

A nondiscriminatory state law still violates the dormant Commerce Clause if its burden on interstate commerce clearly exceeds its local benefits, as in Bibb v. Navajo Freight Lines.

Question 4

A landowner conveys property "to my daughter for life, then to my daughter's children who reach age 25." The daughter has one child, age 3, at the time of the conveyance. Under the common law Rule Against Perpetuities, the remainder to the children is:

Accepted Answer

Void because a child might reach 25 more than 21 years after all lives in being die

Answer

The daughter could have another child who reaches 25 more than 21 years after every life in being dies, so the interest violates the Rule Against Perpetuities.

Question 5

A pedestrian sues a driver for negligence in federal court based on diversity jurisdiction, claiming $80,000 in damages. The jury awards $60,000. The driver moves for judgment as a matter of law for the first time after the verdict. The motion should be:

Accepted Answer

Denied because the driver failed to move for judgment as a matter of law before the case went to the jury

Answer

A renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law under Rule 50(b) requires a prior Rule 50(a) motion made before submission to the jury.

(UT Bar) Utah Bar Exam Practice Test

(UT Bar) Utah Bar Exam Practice Test

UT Bar Multistate Bar 2