Critical Thinking and Logic Flashcards
6 cards from real UDEE practice questions. Tap to flip, then mark Knew It or Still Learning — missed cards come back until you master them.
Read the first 6 Critical Thinking and Logic flashcards as text
Officers are instructed that only vehicles with white stickers may park in Lot C. Officer Chen observes a vehicle parked in Lot C with no sticker. The officer should FIRST:
Answer: Verify the vehicle does not have a sticker that may not be visible from the current angle
Before taking enforcement action, an officer should confirm the facts — in this case, verify that no sticker is present from all angles.
Statement: Some guards on Night Shift are also trained EMTs. Statement: Officer Rivera is on Night Shift. Conclusion: Officer Rivera is a trained EMT. This conclusion is:
Answer: Cannot be determined from the statements
'Some' guards are EMTs — not all. Officer Rivera may or may not be one of the EMT-trained guards, so the conclusion cannot be confirmed.
An officer is reviewing access logs. The log shows an employee badge was used to enter the server room at 0230. The employee's normal shift is 0800–1600. The MOST appropriate initial response is:
Answer: Flag the entry as anomalous and initiate a verification check
An access event outside an employee's normal schedule is an anomaly that warrants verification before any further action is taken.
A supervisor states: 'Anytime the alert level is raised to Red, all non-essential staff must evacuate.' The alert is currently at Yellow. Which is TRUE?
Answer: Non-essential staff do not need to evacuate
The evacuation rule only triggers at Red alert. At Yellow, the condition for evacuation has not been met, so no evacuation is required.
Officer Davis writes in his report: 'The suspect ran north on 5th Avenue.' Surveillance footage later shows the suspect ran south. Officer Davis most likely:
Answer: Made an honest directional error during a stressful incident
Under stress, officers often make honest errors in reporting directional information; this is the most probable explanation rather than intentional falsification.
A supervisor says that disciplinary action is taken only when three conditions are ALL present: (1) a policy violation, (2) evidence on file, and (3) supervisor approval. Evidence is on file and a policy violation occurred, but no supervisor approval was given. Should disciplinary action be taken?
Answer: No, because all three conditions must be present
The rule requires all three conditions simultaneously. With only two conditions met, the requirement is not satisfied and disciplinary action cannot proceed.