Transcription Verbatim and Edited Transcription Techniques 2 — Questions and Answers
Question 1: What does 'edited' or 'non-verbatim' transcription typically omit compared to verbatim transcription?
- Speaker names and timestamps
- Filler words, false starts, and excessive repetitions (Correct answer)
- Technical jargon and industry-specific terms
- Quoted speech and direct citations
Correct answer: Filler words, false starts, and excessive repetitions
Edited transcription omits filler words (um, uh), false starts, and unnecessary repetitions to produce a cleaner, more readable document that still accurately reflects the speaker's meaning.
Question 2: What is 'intelligent verbatim' transcription?
- Transcription performed by AI software without human review
- A style that captures all words but omits non-verbal sounds and filler words (Correct answer)
- Transcription that adds explanatory notes to clarify the speaker's meaning
- A method where only questions and answers are transcribed, not introductions
Correct answer: A style that captures all words but omits non-verbal sounds and filler words
Intelligent verbatim transcription captures the speaker's actual words while cleaning up disfluencies like 'um,' 'uh,' false starts, and excessive repetitions for a more polished result.
Question 3: How should stuttering be handled in strict verbatim transcription?
- Omit the stutter and only transcribe the successfully completed word
- Correct the stuttered word to its proper form
- Transcribe each repeated syllable exactly as heard (e.g., 'I-I-I was there') (Correct answer)
- Replace stuttering with '[stutter]' notation only
Correct answer: Transcribe each repeated syllable exactly as heard (e.g., 'I-I-I was there')
In strict verbatim transcription, stuttering is transcribed exactly as it sounds, repeating the syllable or word as many times as the speaker repeated it.
Question 4: Which transcription style is generally most appropriate for focus group research transcripts?
- Summarized transcription
- Strict verbatim transcription (Correct answer)
- Phonetic transcription
- Back-translation transcription
Correct answer: Strict verbatim transcription
Focus group research transcripts typically require strict verbatim transcription because researchers analyze not just what participants said, but how they said it, including hesitations and emotional cues.
Question 5: In which scenario would a transcriptionist be correct to NOT remove false starts from a transcript?
- When producing a podcast transcript for a company website
- When creating captions for a corporate training video
- When transcribing a legal deposition or court proceeding (Correct answer)
- When summarizing a recorded executive presentation
Correct answer: When transcribing a legal deposition or court proceeding
Legal depositions require strict verbatim transcripts where nothing is altered or removed, because false starts and corrections can be significant to the legal record.
Question 6: When crosstalk occurs (multiple speakers talking at the same time), what is the best practice in verbatim transcription?
- Transcribe only the speaker who is easiest to hear and ignore the others
- Note [crosstalk] or [inaudible — crosstalk] and transcribe as much as can be clearly heard (Correct answer)
- Skip to the next clear segment and note the time gap
- Transcribe only the first speaker to begin talking and note others were speaking
Correct answer: Note [crosstalk] or [inaudible — crosstalk] and transcribe as much as can be clearly heard
Industry best practice is to use a [crosstalk] or [inaudible] notation and transcribe whatever portions can be clearly discerned, accurately reflecting the difficulty of the audio.
Question 7: What is the primary reason edited transcription is preferred for published podcast transcripts?
- It is faster to produce and therefore less expensive
- It is easier for readers to follow without distracting filler words and false starts (Correct answer)
- It omits copyrighted material that cannot be reproduced in print
- It reduces the word count to avoid lengthy documents
Correct answer: It is easier for readers to follow without distracting filler words and false starts
Edited transcription removes the natural disfluencies of spoken language that read awkwardly in print, producing a document that communicates the speaker's ideas clearly to a reading audience.
What does 'edited' or 'non-verbatim' transcription typically omit compared to verbatim transcription?