← All TMUA Flashcard Decks

Proof Techniques Flashcards

7 cards from real TMUA practice questions. Tap to flip, then mark Knew It or Still Learning — missed cards come back until you master them.

Read the first 7 Proof Techniques flashcards as text
  1. Which of the following is NOT a valid method of mathematical proof?

    Answer: Proof by example

    A single example proves existence but cannot prove a universal statement; only a counterexample can disprove one.

  2. To prove ∑_{k=1}^{n} k = n(n+1)/2 by induction, the base case checks:

    Answer: n = 1: 1 = 1(2)/2 ✓

    The standard base case is n = 1: the left side is 1 and the right side is 1(2)/2 = 1, which checks out.

  3. If a proof assumes 'let n be an arbitrary even integer' and derives a property, the conclusion holds for:

    Answer: All even integers

    Proving a property for an arbitrary even integer, with no further assumptions, establishes it universally for all even integers.

  4. A proof shows: 'Assume for contradiction that there are finitely many primes p₁, p₂, …, pₙ. Consider N = p₁p₂⋯pₙ + 1.' The next key observation is:

    Answer: N has a prime factor not in the list

    N leaves remainder 1 when divided by any pᵢ, so its prime factors are not in the assumed complete list — a contradiction.

  5. What is the logical form of modus tollens?

    Answer: ¬Q, P ⇒ Q ⊢ ¬P

    Modus tollens: given P ⇒ Q and ¬Q, we conclude ¬P — the basis of many proof by contradiction arguments.

  6. When proving 'there are infinitely many odd numbers', the most direct approach is:

    Answer: Proof by induction showing 2n−1 is odd for all n ∈ ℕ

    Showing the formula 2n−1 is odd for every positive integer n directly exhibits infinitely many odd numbers.

  7. In a proof by induction on a statement about divisibility, the inductive step typically uses:

    Answer: The inductive hypothesis to rewrite the (k+1)-th expression in terms of the k-th

    The inductive hypothesis P(k) is substituted into the expression for P(k+1) to complete the divisibility argument.