TalentLens Critical Thinking & Problem-Solving 4

Question 1

In a logical syllogism: 'All managers attend meetings. Sarah attends meetings. Therefore Sarah is a manager.' What is wrong with this argument?

Accepted Answer

It commits the fallacy of affirming the consequent

Answer

Affirming the consequent incorrectly concludes that if a result is true, the original cause must also be true, ignoring other possibilities.

Question 2

A product team receives two contradictory user research reports about feature preferences. The BEST critical thinking response is to:

Accepted Answer

Investigate the methodologies, sample sizes, and contexts of both studies

Answer

Contradictory evidence calls for examining how each study was conducted to understand why results differ before drawing conclusions.

Question 3

Which of the following is an example of an 'appeal to ignorance' fallacy?

Accepted Answer

'No one has proven this treatment doesn't work, so it must be effective'

Answer

Appeal to ignorance assumes something is true simply because it has not been proven false, which is a logical error.

Question 4

When using the IDEAL problem-solving model, what does the 'E' stand for?

Accepted Answer

Evaluate the solutions

Answer

In IDEAL (Identify, Define, Explore, Act, Look back), 'E' stands for Explore possible strategies or solutions.

Question 5

A data analyst discovers an outlier in a dataset that dramatically changes the statistical conclusion. The BEST action is to:

Accepted Answer

Investigate the outlier's cause before deciding whether to include or exclude it

Answer

Outliers may represent errors or genuine phenomena; understanding the cause determines whether removal is justified.

(TalentLens) TalentLens Practice Tests Practice Test