Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Flashcards
7 cards from real TALENTLENS practice questions. Tap to flip, then mark Knew It or Still Learning — missed cards come back until you master them.
Read the first 7 Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking flashcards as text
A study shows that employees who attend weekly team meetings report higher job satisfaction. A manager concludes that holding more meetings will increase satisfaction. Which critical thinking error does this illustrate?
Answer: Confusing correlation with causation
Correlation between meetings and satisfaction does not establish that meetings cause higher satisfaction; another factor may explain both.
Premise: All certified accountants passed the CPA exam. Premise: Maria passed the CPA exam. Conclusion: Maria is a certified accountant. This argument is:
Answer: Invalid because the conclusion does not follow from the premises
The argument commits the fallacy of affirming the consequent; passing the CPA exam is necessary but may not be sufficient for certification.
A neighborhood sees crime rise after a new streetlight is installed. A resident argues the streetlight caused the crime increase. What assumption must be true for this argument to hold?
Answer: Streetlights attract criminals who prefer lit environments
The causal claim requires assuming some mechanism by which the streetlight leads to more crime.
Which of the following is the STRONGEST counter-argument to the claim: 'Social media use causes depression in teenagers'?
Answer: Teenagers who are already depressed may seek more social media use, not the reverse
Reverse causation—depressed teens using social media more—directly undermines the direction of the causal claim.
A politician states: 'Either we cut the education budget or schools will collapse.' A critical thinker should first question:
Answer: Whether these are truly the only two options available
The statement presents a false dichotomy; other budgetary solutions may exist beyond the two presented.
Read the following argument: 'No studies have proven that this supplement is harmful, so it must be safe.' This is an example of:
Answer: Appeal to ignorance (argumentum ad ignorantiam)
Absence of evidence of harm is not the same as evidence of safety; this is the classic appeal to ignorance.
A company reports that customer complaints dropped 40% after launching a new service portal. The CEO claims the portal solved customer dissatisfaction. What additional information would MOST strengthen this conclusion?
Answer: Customer satisfaction survey scores also improved over the same period
Independent evidence of improved satisfaction would corroborate the causal link between the portal and reduced complaints.