Reading Comprehension and Logic Flashcards
7 cards from real State Trooper practice questions. Tap to flip, then mark Knew It or Still Learning — missed cards come back until you master them.
Read the first 7 Reading Comprehension and Logic flashcards as text
Passage: 'No trooper may work more than 16 consecutive hours without a mandatory 8-hour rest period. Exceptions require written approval from the shift commander.' Trooper Park has worked 15 hours. How many more hours can she work without an exception?
Answer: 1 hour
The limit is 16 consecutive hours — after 15 hours, she may work 1 more hour before the mandatory rest period applies.
A criminal statute reads: 'A person commits assault if they intentionally cause apprehension of imminent harmful contact.' A man raises his fist at a victim but does not make contact. Is this assault under the statute?
Answer: Yes, if the victim feared imminent harmful contact
The statute requires intentional action causing apprehension of imminent harm — physical contact is not required; the victim's fear is the key element.
No evidence from an unlawful search may be used in court. The evidence against Roberts was obtained through an unlawful search. What follows logically?
Answer: The evidence against Roberts cannot be used in court
The logical rule says unlawfully obtained evidence cannot be used — it does not automatically lead to acquittal or immediate release.
A field manual reads: 'When approaching a potentially armed subject, officers should position themselves at an angle to minimize their profile, maintain distance, and keep hands visible.' A trooper approaches a suspect near their vehicle. Which action violates this guidance?
Answer: Standing directly in front of the suspect at close range
Standing directly in front at close range maximizes the trooper's profile and minimizes distance — both contradict the manual's guidance.
A trooper reviews a crime report with the following facts: a burglary occurred between 10 PM and 2 AM; the suspect wore dark clothing; entry was through a rear window; nothing was taken. Which conclusion is most logically supported?
Answer: Nothing was taken, but the time, method, and appearance of the suspect are established facts
The only conclusions fully supported by the evidence are the established facts — time, clothing, and entry method; the motive and identity remain unknown.
All troopers assigned to Highway Patrol must complete advanced driving certification. Trooper Gomez has not completed advanced driving certification. What can be concluded?
Answer: Trooper Gomez is not assigned to Highway Patrol
If all Highway Patrol troopers have the certification and Gomez does not, then Gomez is not on Highway Patrol.
Dispatch report: 'A caller reported a suspicious man in a gray hoodie near Pine Street at 9:15 PM. The caller said the man was looking into parked cars.' What is the MOST accurate summary of the report?
Answer: At 9:15 PM, a man in a gray hoodie was reported looking into parked cars near Pine Street
The report summarizes only what was observed and reported — labeling it theft or burglary goes beyond what the caller stated.