SSSTS Risk Assessment & Method Statement Review 4

Question 1

What does 'significant finding' mean in the context of risk assessment records?

Accepted Answer

A hazard that poses a real risk that requires a control measure to be implemented — not trivial hazards with negligible risk

Answer

A significant finding is a hazard or risk that is not trivial and requires control action. Trivial hazards with negligible risk do not need to be recorded, but all hazards that could realistically cause harm must be recorded and controlled.

Question 2

How should a method statement be communicated to workers?

Accepted Answer

Through a briefing (toolbox talk) with opportunity for questions, confirmed by workers signing to confirm they have understood

Answer

The method statement must be actively communicated to all workers who will carry out the task, typically through a toolbox talk or pre-task briefing. Workers must have the opportunity to ask questions and confirm they understand what is required.

Question 3

What should a supervisor check when reviewing a subcontractor's risk assessment for working at height?

Accepted Answer

That it identifies specific fall hazards, specifies collective protection before personal protection, and names the type of access equipment to be used

Answer

A supervisor reviewing a working-at-height risk assessment must check that it identifies specific fall hazards, follows the WAH hierarchy (collective over personal protection), specifies the access equipment to be used, names the competent person for inspections and covers emergency procedures.

Question 4

What is a 'high-risk activity' method statement and what additional content is typically required?

Accepted Answer

Activities with high injury potential (e.g., demolition, deep excavation, confined spaces) require more detailed method statements including rescue plans, specific equipment details and emergency procedures

Answer

High-risk activities require more detailed method statements that address the specific elevated risks. For example, confined space entry requires a rescue plan, atmospheric testing procedures and emergency arrangements not needed for lower-risk activities.

Question 5

What is the purpose of asking 'what if?' questions when reviewing a method statement?

Accepted Answer

To identify potential failure scenarios not addressed in the method statement — for example, what if the shoring fails, what if the load shifts, what if the MEWP breaks down?

Answer

'What if?' questioning is a technique for stress-testing method statements by considering foreseeable failure scenarios. If the method statement does not address the 'what if?', it needs to be revised to include the appropriate contingency measures.

SSSTS Practice Test

SSSTS Practice Test

SSSTS Risk Assessment & Method Statement Review 4