Smart Serve Duty of Care and Legal Liability Flashcards
6 cards from real SMART SERVE practice questions. Tap to flip, then mark Knew It or Still Learning — missed cards come back until you master them.
Read the first 6 Smart Serve Duty of Care and Legal Liability flashcards as text
What is the 'duty of care' in the context of Ontario alcohol service?
Answer: A legal obligation requiring those who serve alcohol to take reasonable steps to protect patrons and third parties from foreseeable harm
The duty of care in Ontario alcohol service is a legal obligation that requires servers, managers, and licence holders to take reasonable steps to prevent foreseeable harm to both their patrons and third parties who might be affected by their patrons' actions. This duty is established through legislation and case law.
Under Ontario law, to whom does an alcohol server owe a duty of care?
Answer: To the patron being served, other patrons in the establishment, and third parties such as other road users who may be harmed by an intoxicated patron
Ontario law establishes that alcohol servers owe a duty of care to multiple parties: the patron they are serving (to prevent over-service), other patrons in the establishment, and third parties who could foreseeably be harmed by an intoxicated patron, such as other drivers if the patron drives home.
What is the legal concept of 'commercial host liability' in Ontario?
Answer: It holds businesses that sell or serve alcohol liable for damages caused by patrons they over-served or served irresponsibly
Commercial host liability is the legal principle that businesses selling or serving alcohol can be held liable for damages caused by patrons to whom they provided irresponsible service. This was firmly established in Canadian case law and reinforced by Ontario legislation.
What landmark Canadian case established that commercial hosts can be liable for the actions of intoxicated patrons?
Answer: Jordan House v. Menow (1974), where the Supreme Court held a hotel liable for an intoxicated patron who was injured after being asked to leave
In Jordan House v. Menow (1974), the Supreme Court of Canada established that commercial hosts owe a duty of care to their patrons. The hotel was found liable because they served alcohol to a visibly intoxicated patron and then asked him to leave, knowing he would likely attempt to walk along a busy highway.
How does the concept of 'foreseeability' relate to duty of care in alcohol service?
Answer: If harm to the patron or a third party was reasonably foreseeable given the patron's intoxication, the server and establishment may be liable for failing to prevent it
Foreseeability is a cornerstone of duty of care. If it was reasonably foreseeable that continuing to serve an intoxicated patron could lead to harm — whether to the patron, other patrons, or third parties like other drivers — then the failure to stop service or take preventive action can establish liability.
What is 'vicarious liability' and how does it apply to licensed establishments in Ontario?
Answer: It means the employer (licence holder) can be held liable for the negligent actions of their employees committed during the course of employment
Vicarious liability means that licence holders can be held legally responsible for the negligent actions of their employees that occur during the course of employment. If a server over-serves a patron and that patron causes harm, the establishment owner can be held liable even if they were not personally present.