SLP - Speech-Language Pathology Fluency and Its Disorders Questions and Answers — Questions and Answers
Question 1: An 8-year-old boy is referred for a fluency evaluation. His teacher reports that he speaks very quickly, often deletes syllables, and uses an excessive number of interjections like 'um' and 'like'. During assessment, the SLP notes that the boy's speech is often difficult to understand due to a rapid and irregular rate, but he does not exhibit sound prolongations or blocks. He also seems largely unaware of his speech difficulties. Which fluency disorder is the most likely diagnosis?
- Neurogenic stuttering
- Developmental stuttering
- Cluttering (Correct answer)
- Psychogenic stuttering
Correct answer: Cluttering
The client's symptoms, including a rapid and/or irregular speech rate, excessive 'normal' disfluencies, collapsing of syllables, and a lack of awareness, are hallmark characteristics of cluttering. Developmental stuttering typically involves core behaviors like repetitions, prolongations, and blocks, which were not reported. Neurogenic and psychogenic stuttering are acquired disorders with specific onsets related to neurological or psychological events, which are not indicated in the case history.
Question 2: A 65-year-old male presents with a sudden onset of disfluent speech following a left-hemisphere stroke. His speech is characterized by repetitions and prolongations on all parts of words, including function words. He does not exhibit secondary behaviors like eye blinking or facial grimacing, and his disfluency is consistent across different speaking tasks, including singing. This presentation is most characteristic of:
- Developmental stuttering
- Neurogenic stuttering (Correct answer)
- Cluttering
- Psychogenic stuttering
Correct answer: Neurogenic stuttering
Neurogenic stuttering is an acquired fluency disorder that typically appears after a neurological event, such as a stroke. Key features that differentiate it from developmental stuttering include disfluencies on all word types and in all word positions, a lack of secondary behaviors, and consistency of disfluency across tasks like singing, which often ameliorate developmental stuttering.
Question 3: Which of the following is a primary goal of a stuttering modification approach, such as the one developed by Van Riper?
- To eliminate all disfluencies and achieve perfectly fluent speech.
- To reduce the fear and avoidance associated with stuttering and to stutter more easily. (Correct answer)
- To teach a new, fluent manner of speaking by controlling rate, onset, and articulation.
- To provide parents with verbal contingencies to reinforce fluent speech in their children.
Correct answer: To reduce the fear and avoidance associated with stuttering and to stutter more easily.
Stuttering modification therapy aims to help individuals manage and modify moments of stuttering to reduce struggle, tension, and negative emotions. The goal is not to eliminate stuttering entirely (which is more aligned with fluency shaping), but to stutter in a more controlled, forward-moving, and less effortful way, thereby reducing fear and avoidance.
Question 4: The Lidcombe Program is an evidence-based treatment for early childhood stuttering. Which statement best describes the core components of this approach?
- The SLP teaches the child slow, stretched speech and easy onsets in the clinic.
- It is an indirect treatment where parents modify their own communication style to facilitate fluency.
- Parents are trained by the SLP to provide explicit verbal feedback for stuttered and stutter-free speech in the child's everyday environment.
- Therapy focuses on desensitizing the child to stuttering through voluntary stuttering and disclosure. (Correct answer)
Correct answer: Therapy focuses on desensitizing the child to stuttering through voluntary stuttering and disclosure.
The Lidcombe Program is a direct, parent-implemented behavioral treatment. The essential components involve the clinician training the parent to provide specific verbal contingencies for fluent speech (e.g., praise) and for unambiguous moments of stuttering. Parents also systematically measure the child's stuttering severity daily.
Question 5: In the context of stuttering, behaviors such as eye blinking, head nodding, or using filler words to postpone or escape a moment of disfluency are classified as:
- Core behaviors
- Secondary behaviors (Correct answer)
- Atypical disfluencies
- Anticipatory mannerisms
Correct answer: Secondary behaviors
Secondary behaviors are learned reactions to the core behaviors of stuttering (repetitions, prolongations, blocks). They are adopted, often unconsciously at first, as an attempt to avoid, escape, or push through a moment of stuttering. Core behaviors are the actual speech disfluencies themselves.
Question 6: A speech-language pathologist is choosing between a fluency shaping and a stuttering modification approach for an adult client. The client's primary goals are to produce more fluent speech and to sound as 'normal' as possible, and he is less concerned with his feelings about stuttering. Which approach would be a better initial fit for this client's goals?
- Stuttering Modification, because it reduces tension during moments of stuttering.
- A hybrid approach, as it is always the best practice.
- Fluency Shaping, because it focuses on systematically increasing fluent speech production. (Correct answer)
- An indirect approach, focusing on environmental modifications.
Correct answer: Fluency Shaping, because it focuses on systematically increasing fluent speech production.
Fluency shaping approaches aim to teach a new way of speaking to prevent stuttering from occurring, with the goal of achieving more fluent speech. Techniques often target the timing and tension of speech production, such as easy onsets and light articulatory contacts. Given the client's stated goal of producing more fluent speech, fluency shaping is the more direct fit. Stuttering modification, in contrast, focuses on reducing struggle and fear when stuttering does occur.
An 8-year-old boy is referred for a fluency evaluation.
His teacher reports that he speaks very quickly, often deletes syllables, and uses an excessive number of interjections like 'um' and 'like'.
During assessment, the SLP notes that the boy's speech is often difficult to understand due to a rapid and irregular rate, but he does not exhibit sound prolongations or blocks.
He also seems largely unaware of his speech difficulties.
Which fluency disorder is the most likely diagnosis?