Situational Judgement Test Navigating Team Dynamics 3 — Questions and Answers
Question 1: Your team's most experienced member often completes tasks correctly but refuses to document their process, creating a knowledge silo. What is the MOST effective approach?
- Accept the silo because the expert's speed outweighs the documentation risk.
- Have another team member secretly reverse-engineer the process.
- Frame documentation as a team resilience issue and collaboratively agree on a lightweight standard the expert can follow. (Correct answer)
- Mandate documentation and report non-compliance to the manager.
Correct answer: Frame documentation as a team resilience issue and collaboratively agree on a lightweight standard the expert can follow.
Framing documentation as a shared resilience goal and co-creating a low-friction standard increases expert buy-in without creating resentment.
Question 2: During a high-stakes presentation, a colleague makes an error in the data they present to leadership. You notice it in real time. What is the BEST response?
- Interrupt immediately and correct the error loudly to protect the team's credibility.
- Stay silent during the presentation and privately inform your colleague of the error afterward.
- Send an urgent message to leadership during the presentation flagging the error.
- Wait until there's a natural pause, then diplomatically offer a clarification or correction. (Correct answer)
Correct answer: Wait until there's a natural pause, then diplomatically offer a clarification or correction.
Waiting for a natural pause and offering a diplomatic clarification corrects the record while minimizing disruption and embarrassment.
Question 3: Your team is consistently missing sprint goals because estimates are too optimistic. The team resists raising estimates, fearing management scrutiny. What should you do?
- Pad your personal estimates without telling anyone to create hidden buffer.
- Raise the issue in a retrospective, propose historical data-based estimation, and help the team reframe realistic estimates as a credibility asset. (Correct answer)
- Stop pointing out missed goals to avoid demoralizing the team.
- Ask management to lower the project scope without explaining the estimation problem.
Correct answer: Raise the issue in a retrospective, propose historical data-based estimation, and help the team reframe realistic estimates as a credibility asset.
Using retrospective data to reframe accurate estimation as credibility-building addresses the root cause and reduces the team's fear response.
Question 4: A team member frequently takes credit for collaborative work in front of leadership, leaving other contributors unacknowledged. How should you handle this?
- Start taking credit for others' work in retaliation.
- Proactively name contributors when presenting shared work, and privately let the team member know attribution matters. (Correct answer)
- Complain to colleagues about the behavior but take no direct action.
- Stop collaborating with that person entirely to protect your credit.
Correct answer: Proactively name contributors when presenting shared work, and privately let the team member know attribution matters.
Actively attributing contributions publicly and addressing attribution norms privately creates a culture of shared credit without direct conflict.
Question 5: Your team has just gone through a reorg and lost two key members. Remaining members are anxious and productivity has dropped. What is the MOST effective leadership behavior?
- Increase workload expectations to keep the team focused and distracted from anxiety.
- Acknowledge the disruption openly, clarify roles and priorities, and create short-term wins to rebuild momentum. (Correct answer)
- Pretend nothing has changed and enforce the same processes and timelines.
- Allow the team unlimited time to adjust with no deadlines until morale recovers.
Correct answer: Acknowledge the disruption openly, clarify roles and priorities, and create short-term wins to rebuild momentum.
Naming the disruption, clarifying what is still stable, and creating early wins are evidence-based strategies for rebuilding team effectiveness after change.
Question 6: One team member is consistently late to meetings but highly productive outside of them. The lateness disrupts the meeting flow. What is the MOST balanced response?
- Start every meeting with the most important agenda items so late arrivals miss context, not decisions.
- Have a direct private conversation about the impact of the lateness and explore whether the meeting time works for them. (Correct answer)
- Publicly call out the lateness at the start of each meeting to create social pressure.
- Remove the team member from meeting invitations to solve the problem.
Correct answer: Have a direct private conversation about the impact of the lateness and explore whether the meeting time works for them.
A private conversation about impact and scheduling barriers addresses the root cause while preserving the relationship with a productive team member.
Question 7: Your team has two dominant personalities who both want to lead every discussion, leaving quieter members unable to contribute. What facilitation move is MOST effective?
- Let the dominant personalities lead, since strong voices often have the best ideas.
- Cut off dominant speakers mid-sentence when they exceed a time limit.
- Use structured turn-taking or round-robin formats and explicitly invite input from quieter members. (Correct answer)
- Split the team into two groups, each led by one of the dominant members.
Correct answer: Use structured turn-taking or round-robin formats and explicitly invite input from quieter members.
Structured participation formats distribute speaking time fairly without singling out or silencing dominant team members.
Your team's most experienced member often completes tasks correctly but refuses to document their process, creating a knowledge silo.
What is the MOST effective approach?