Selenium Testing Framework Risk Assessment & Management 5

Question 1

Which risk is reduced by integrating Selenium tests into a CI/CD pipeline rather than running them manually?

Accepted Answer

Human error and delayed defect detection risk

Answer

Automated CI execution removes human scheduling errors and catches defects immediately after code is merged, reducing the window of undetected bugs.

Question 2

What risk does cross-browser testing with Selenium primarily address?

Accepted Answer

Browser-specific rendering and JavaScript execution inconsistencies that affect users

Answer

Different browsers implement web standards differently, and cross-browser testing with Selenium exposes compatibility defects before they reach real users.

Question 3

A security audit flags that Selenium RemoteWebDriver traffic is sent over HTTP. What risk does this represent?

Accepted Answer

Test commands and potentially sensitive test data can be intercepted in transit

Answer

Unencrypted HTTP traffic between the test runner and Selenium Grid exposes WebDriver commands and any data they carry to network interception.

Question 4

Which approach best mitigates the risk of a Selenium test suite becoming unmaintainable as the application grows?

Accepted Answer

Applying modular design patterns such as Page Object Model and separating test data from logic

Answer

Modular patterns centralize page-specific logic, making it easier to update tests in response to application changes without touching every test case.

Question 5

What is the risk when Selenium tests are tightly coupled to specific user roles or accounts that can be deactivated?

Accepted Answer

Tests will fail if those accounts are disabled or passwords changed, blocking CI

Answer

Dependency on specific accounts creates a fragile single point of failure; dedicated, managed service accounts reduce this risk.

Selenium Testing Framework Practice Test

Selenium Testing Framework Practice Test

Selenium Testing Framework Risk Assessment & Management 5