International Valuation Standards Flashcards

A valuer is engaged to determine the value of a minority shareholding in a private company for a shareholder dispute. The two disputing shareholders have agreed that the valuation should reflect the specific advantages and disadvantages to them as identified parties, rather than the value to the market in general. Which IVS 104 Basis of Value is most appropriate for this assignment?

Answer: Equitable Value

Equitable Value is the estimated price for the transfer of an asset or liability between identified knowledgeable and willing parties that reflects the respective interests of those parties. This basis of value is appropriate here because the valuation is for a dispute between identified parties and needs to consider their specific interests, rather than a hypothetical transaction in the open market (Market Value).

According to the IVS Framework, when can a valuer state that a valuation has been performed in accordance with IVS while also departing from a specific requirement of the standards?

Answer: Only when specific legislative, regulatory, or other authoritative requirements mandate a departure from IVS.

The IVS Framework allows a valuer to state compliance with IVS even with a 'departure,' but only in the specific circumstance where laws or regulations in a jurisdiction conflict with IVS requirements. The valuer must follow the legal or regulatory requirement and disclose the nature of the departure.

Which of the following statements best describes the relationship between the IVS General Standards and the IVS Asset Standards?

Answer: The General Standards provide the foundational principles for all valuations, and the Asset Standards must be applied in conjunction with them for specific asset types.

IVS are structured with General Standards (e.g., IVS 101-106) that apply to all valuation assignments. The Asset Standards (e.g., IVS 200, 300, 400, 500 series) provide additional, specific requirements for particular asset classes and must be followed in conjunction with, not in place of, the General Standards.

In establishing the Scope of Work under IVS 101, a valuer and their client agree to limit the extent of the valuer's investigations. Under what condition would this limitation prevent the valuer from stating the valuation complies with IVS?

Answer: If the limitation means the valuer cannot sufficiently evaluate significant inputs and assumptions.

While the Scope of Work can limit the extent of investigations, IVS requires the valuer to perform sufficient analysis to properly evaluate all significant inputs and assumptions. If a limitation is so substantial that it prevents this evaluation, the valuer cannot state that the engagement was performed in compliance with IVS.

A valuer is selecting valuation approaches for a unique, specialized piece of industrial equipment for which there are no recent market transactions and which does not directly generate its own income stream. According to IVS 105 Valuation Approaches and Methods, which approach would be most appropriate to consider?

Answer: The Cost Approach, by determining the cost to replace the equipment's service capacity.

IVS 105 requires the valuer to consider all three approaches (Market, Income, Cost) and select the most appropriate one(s). In a scenario where there is no active market and no direct income stream, the Cost Approach (e.g., replacement cost) is often the most suitable and sometimes the only possible method for valuing specialized assets.

A public company is acquiring a smaller, private competitor. The acquirer can achieve significant operational efficiencies and cost savings by integrating the target's operations, making the target worth more to the acquirer than to any other potential buyer. A valuation prepared to quantify this value to the specific acquirer would be based on:

Answer: Synergistic Value

Synergistic Value is the result of combining two or more assets where the combined value is more than the sum of the separate values. It reflects particular attributes of an asset that are only of value to a specific purchaser. This perfectly describes the scenario where cost savings create additional value available only to the specific acquirer.