Analyzing Informational Texts Flashcards
7 cards from real RLA practice questions. Tap to flip, then mark Knew It or Still Learning — missed cards come back until you master them.
Read the first 7 Analyzing Informational Texts flashcards as text
A government report states that unemployment fell by 2% last year, but a footnote explains the figure excludes people who stopped looking for work. What is this footnote an example of?
Answer: A qualifying detail that affects interpretation
Qualifying details like footnotes can significantly change how a statistic should be interpreted.
An author writes: 'Studies suggest a link between social media use and anxiety in teenagers.' Which word signals that this claim is NOT conclusively proven?
Answer: suggest
'Suggest' is a hedging word indicating the evidence points toward a conclusion without confirming it definitively.
Two passages both discuss climate change. Passage A focuses on economic costs of inaction; Passage B focuses on technological solutions. What is the most accurate way to describe their relationship?
Answer: They address the same topic from different angles
Texts can address the same subject while emphasizing different aspects without necessarily contradicting each other.
A passage includes a graph showing rising test scores alongside a paragraph claiming the new curriculum caused the improvement. What reasoning error is present?
Answer: Correlation mistaken for causation
Correlation between two trends does not prove that one caused the other without ruling out other explanations.
An informational article is organized with headings like 'Background,' 'Evidence,' and 'Implications.' How does this structure primarily help the reader?
Answer: It allows readers to locate and navigate information efficiently
Headings organize text into labeled sections so readers can find specific information quickly.
A medical pamphlet uses the phrase 'may reduce risk' rather than 'eliminates risk.' What does this language choice reveal about the author's intent?
Answer: The author is being precise and avoiding overstatement
Careful word choice like 'may reduce' reflects scientific precision and honesty about the limits of evidence.
A reader notices that an article about a new drug was funded by the pharmaceutical company that manufactures it. Why is this relevant when evaluating the article?
Answer: It suggests a potential conflict of interest that may bias the findings
Funding sources can create conflicts of interest that influence how research is conducted or reported.