Proofreading & Editing Editorial Ethics & Professional Practice 2 — Questions and Answers
Question 1: What is the difference between a 'line edit' and a 'proofread'?
- A line edit focuses on final surface errors; a proofread addresses style and clarity
- A line edit improves sentence-level style and clarity; a proofread catches final surface errors (Correct answer)
- There is no difference — both are identical tasks
- A proofread is always performed before a line edit
Correct answer: A line edit improves sentence-level style and clarity; a proofread catches final surface errors
A line edit addresses sentence-level style, clarity, and flow, while proofreading is the final check for surface errors — typos, punctuation, and formatting — before publication.
Question 2: What does it mean to 'edit to house style'?
- To reformat the manuscript to fit a specific page size
- To revise the manuscript to conform to the publisher's or client's specific editorial rules (Correct answer)
- To simplify the language for a general audience
- To ensure the document matches an academic citation format
Correct answer: To revise the manuscript to conform to the publisher's or client's specific editorial rules
Editing to house style means applying the specific editorial conventions of the publisher or organization — their preferred spellings, punctuation, and formatting rules.
Question 3: What is plagiarism in an editorial context?
- Using overly complex language in a manuscript
- Presenting someone else's words or ideas as one's own without attribution (Correct answer)
- Submitting a manuscript with spelling errors
- Editing a document without the author's permission
Correct answer: Presenting someone else's words or ideas as one's own without attribution
Plagiarism is the act of using another person's words, ideas, or work without proper attribution, presenting them as one's own.
Question 4: Which of the following best describes the editor's role in a collaborative author-editor relationship?
- The editor has final authority over all content decisions
- The editor serves as a critical reader who helps the author improve their work while respecting their vision (Correct answer)
- The editor should rewrite the manuscript to reflect their own style
- The editor approves or rejects content based on personal preference
Correct answer: The editor serves as a critical reader who helps the author improve their work while respecting their vision
A good editor serves the author's vision — providing objective feedback, catching errors, and improving clarity while leaving ultimate content decisions to the author.
Question 5: What is the standard turnaround time expectation for a thorough copy edit of a standard manuscript (60,000–80,000 words)?
- A few hours
- 1–2 days
- 1–3 weeks (Correct answer)
- Several months
Correct answer: 1–3 weeks
A thorough copy edit of a full-length manuscript typically takes 1–3 weeks, depending on the manuscript's condition and the editor's workload.
Question 6: What does 'editorial objectivity' require?
- That the editor agree with the author's viewpoint
- That the editor set aside personal biases to evaluate the manuscript on its own terms (Correct answer)
- That the editor only work on topics they are passionate about
- That the editor never ask questions of the author
Correct answer: That the editor set aside personal biases to evaluate the manuscript on its own terms
Editorial objectivity requires editors to evaluate and improve a manuscript based on professional standards and the author's goals, not the editor's personal opinions.
What is the difference between a 'line edit' and a 'proofread'?