PI Interpreting Assessment Patterns 3 — Questions and Answers
Question 1: A manager notices that a direct report's PI Synthesis pattern scores are noticeably higher in Dominance than their Self pattern. What is the most reasonable interpretation?
- The employee is naturally very dominant but hides it
- The employee perceives the job requires more assertiveness than feels natural to them (Correct answer)
- The assessment results are invalid and should be retaken
- The employee is dissatisfied with their compensation
Correct answer: The employee perceives the job requires more assertiveness than feels natural to them
When the Synthesis (perceived job demands) exceeds the Self (natural style) on Dominance, the employee is stretching to be more assertive than is natural.
Question 2: Which PI Reference Profile is best characterized by high Dominance, high Extraversion, low Patience, and low Formality?
- Craftsman
- Scholar
- Maverick (Correct answer)
- Controller
Correct answer: Maverick
The Maverick profile combines high drive and social boldness with low structure-seeking and low patience, making them entrepreneurial risk-takers.
Question 3: In PI's Job Assessment, what is a 'Job Target'?
- A salary range set for a role
- A behavioral pattern describing the ideal candidate's PI profile for a specific job (Correct answer)
- A performance rating applied after 90 days of employment
- A list of competencies derived from a 360-degree feedback process
Correct answer: A behavioral pattern describing the ideal candidate's PI profile for a specific job
A Job Target is the factor pattern that describes the behavioral drives most likely to lead to success in a specific role.
Question 4: An employee with high Patience and high Formality would MOST likely excel in which role?
- Venture capital deal sourcing
- Regulatory compliance auditing (Correct answer)
- Crisis communications spokesperson
- Sales development representative making cold calls
Correct answer: Regulatory compliance auditing
High Patience and high Formality align with steady, rule-governed, detail-oriented work like compliance auditing.
Question 5: If a PI pattern shows all four factors in the middle of the range (moderate scores), this is often interpreted as:
- The candidate being the most versatile hire available
- A profile that is difficult to interpret and may warrant a follow-up conversation (Correct answer)
- An invalid assessment due to random answering
- A Craftsman reference profile
Correct answer: A profile that is difficult to interpret and may warrant a follow-up conversation
Moderate scores on all factors can make behavioral tendencies less predictable and warrant conversation to understand how the person actually operates.
Question 6: Which statement about using PI Reference Profiles in hiring is most accurate?
- Candidates must match the Reference Profile exactly to be considered
- Reference Profiles are useful guides but should not be used as rigid pass/fail criteria (Correct answer)
- Only candidates with profiles in the 'Analytical' group should be hired for analytical roles
- Reference Profiles replace the need for structured interviews
Correct answer: Reference Profiles are useful guides but should not be used as rigid pass/fail criteria
PI Reference Profiles are descriptive tools to guide conversations and fit analysis, not strict cutoff criteria for hiring decisions.
Question 7: An individual with low Dominance (Factor A) is most likely to:
- Aggressively pursue stretch goals and challenge leadership decisions
- Defer to others in conflict and avoid asserting personal agenda (Correct answer)
- Struggle to complete detail-oriented tasks
- Avoid social settings and prefer isolated work
Correct answer: Defer to others in conflict and avoid asserting personal agenda
Low Dominance indicates a person who is accommodating, avoids confrontation, and tends to support others' agendas rather than asserting their own.
A manager notices that a direct report's PI Synthesis pattern scores are noticeably higher in Dominance than their Self pattern.
What is the most reasonable interpretation?