PhD Doctor of Philosophy Philosophy and You 3 ā Questions and Answers
Question 1: You are writing your dissertation and realize two of your core claims are inconsistent. The process of revising both your principles and your particular judgments until they align is called:
- Inference to the best explanation
- Reflective equilibrium (Correct answer)
- Transcendental deduction
- Inductive generalization
Correct answer: Reflective equilibrium
Reflective equilibrium, developed by Rawls, involves iteratively adjusting general principles and particular judgments until they cohere with each other.
Question 2: Which view holds that the meaning of a concept is determined by its role in a network of inferential relations rather than by reference to objects in the world?
- Semantic externalism
- Conceptual role semantics (inferential role semantics) (Correct answer)
- Causal theory of reference
- Descriptivist theory of names
Correct answer: Conceptual role semantics (inferential role semantics)
Conceptual role semantics identifies meaning with inferential roleāwhat a concept licenses you to inferārather than with external referents.
Question 3: When a PhD candidate defends her thesis, the committee challenges her to justify her foundational assumptions. She argues those assumptions are self-evident. This strategy aligns with:
- Coherentism
- Infinitism
- Foundationalism (Correct answer)
- Pragmatism
Correct answer: Foundationalism
Foundationalism holds that the regress of justification terminates in basic beliefs that are self-evident, incorrigible, or directly evident.
Question 4: The claim that personal identity over time consists in psychological continuityāoverlapping chains of memory and intentionāis most associated with:
- John Locke and Derek Parfit (Correct answer)
- Aristotle and Thomas Aquinas
- Immanuel Kant and Hegel
- David Hume and Gilbert Ryle
Correct answer: John Locke and Derek Parfit
Locke first grounded personal identity in memory and consciousness; Parfit refined this into a psychological continuity theory that challenges conventional notions of personal survival.
Question 5: A philosophy professor assigns students to argue for positions they personally oppose. This exercise primarily develops which capacity?
- Epistemic humility and perspective-taking (Correct answer)
- Confirmation of existing beliefs
- Logical fallacy identification
- Memorization of canonical texts
Correct answer: Epistemic humility and perspective-taking
Steelmanning opposing views cultivates intellectual humility and the ability to understand why reasonable people hold different positionsācore philosophical virtues.
Question 6: Which of the following is the best example of an ad hominem fallacy in philosophical debate?
- Pointing out that an argument's premises are false
- Dismissing Nietzsche's views because he suffered mental illness (Correct answer)
- Noting a logical contradiction in an opponent's position
- Questioning the relevance of an analogy
Correct answer: Dismissing Nietzsche's views because he suffered mental illness
Ad hominem attacks the person making the argument rather than the argument itself; a philosopher's biography cannot directly invalidate the logical structure of their claims.
Question 7: The phrase 'existence precedes essence,' central to Sartrean existentialism, means:
- God defines human nature before humans are born
- Humans first exist without a fixed nature and create their own essence through choices (Correct answer)
- Biological nature determines human possibility
- Social structures define individual identity from birth
Correct answer: Humans first exist without a fixed nature and create their own essence through choices
Sartre argued that unlike a manufactured object (whose essence is planned first), humans exist before they have any predetermined nature and must freely create themselves.
You are writing your dissertation and realize two of your core claims are inconsistent.
The process of revising both your principles and your particular judgments until they align is called: